Literature DB >> 8916020

Tumor 31P NMR pH measurements in vivo: a comparison of inorganic phosphate and intracellular 2-deoxyglucose-6-phosphate as pHnmr indicators in murine radiation-induced fibrosarcoma-1.

G E Soto1, Z Zhu, J L Evelhoch, J J Ackerman.   

Abstract

Uncertainty regarding the intracellular/extracellular distribution of inorganic phosphate (P(i)) in tumors has raised concerns that pH calculated from the tumor P(i) chemical shift may not accurately represent the intracellular pH (pHin). This issue was addressed in subcutaneously transplanted murine radiation induced fibrosarcoma-1 by directly comparing pH measured via P(i) with pH measured via the in situ generated intracellular xenometabolite 2-deoxyglucose-6-phosphate (2DG6P). In 131 comparative measurements employing eight tumor-bearing mice under both control and hyperglycemic conditions (the latter to extend the range of tumor pH examined), the pH as derived from either 2DG6P or P(i) showed only a small, but statistically significant, difference (0.07 +/- 0.11 SD; P = 0.0001). Scatter in the comparative analysis over the pH range examined (ca. 5.5-7.5) was not uniform. Above pH 6.6, 2DG6P indicated a pH lower than that of P(i) by 0.088 +/- 0.105 SD (n = 107, P = 0.0001); below pH 6.6, 2DG6P indicated a pH essentially identical to and not statistically different from that of P(i) (mean difference 0.003 +/- 0.128 SD (n = 24, P = 0.92)). Evidence is presented in support of this differential arising from a systematic measurement error due to peak overlap between 2DG6P and endogenous phosphomonoester species. These results support the use of P(i) as a tumor 31P NMR pHin indicator, at least in RIF-1 tumors under control and hyperglycemic conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8916020     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910360508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  9 in total

1.  Label-Free in Situ pH Monitoring in a Single Living Cell Using an Optical Nanoprobe.

Authors:  Qingbo Yang; Xiaobei Zhang; Yang Song; Ke Li; Honglan Shi; Hai Xiao; Yinfa Ma
Journal:  Med Devices Sens       Date:  2020-03-12

2.  Understanding the pharmacological properties of a metabolic PET tracer in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nerissa Therese Viola-Villegas; Sean D Carlin; Ellen Ackerstaff; Kuntal K Sevak; Vadim Divilov; Inna Serganova; Natalia Kruchevsky; Michael Anderson; Ronald G Blasberg; Oleg A Andreev; Donald M Engelman; Jason A Koutcher; Yana K Reshetnyak; Jason S Lewis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Imaging pH and metastasis.

Authors:  Arig Ibrahim Hashim; Xiaomeng Zhang; Jonathan W Wojtkowiak; Gary V Martinez; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  pH-Sensitive MR Responses Induced by Dendron-Functionalized SPIONs.

Authors:  Indrajit Saha; Kathleen E Chaffee; Chuansong Duanmu; Brooke M Woods; Ashley M Stokes; Laura E Buck; Laura L Walkup; Narsimha Sattenapally; Jodi Huggenvik; Yong Gao; Boyd M Goodson
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 4.126

5.  Pilot study of Iopamidol-based quantitative pH imaging on a clinical 3T MR scanner.

Authors:  Anja Müller-Lutz; Nadia Khalil; Benjamin Schmitt; Vladimir Jellus; Gael Pentang; Georg Oeltzschner; Gerald Antoch; Rotem S Lanzman; Hans-Jörg Wittsack
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Functional electron paramagnetic resonance imaging of ischemic rat heart: Monitoring of tissue oxygenation and pH.

Authors:  Artem A Gorodetsky; Igor A Kirilyuk; Valery V Khramtsov; Denis A Komarov
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 7.  High-field small animal magnetic resonance oncology studies.

Authors:  Louisa Bokacheva; Ellen Ackerstaff; H Carl LeKaye; Kristen Zakian; Jason A Koutcher
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Contradiction between amide-CEST signal and pH in breast cancer explained with metabolic MRI.

Authors:  Erwin Krikken; Wybe J M van der Kemp; Vitaliy Khlebnikov; Thijs van Dalen; Maartje Los; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Peter R Luijten; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Dennis W J Klomp; Jannie P Wijnen
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Establishing upper limits on neuronal activity-evoked pH changes with APT-CEST MRI at 7 T.

Authors:  Vitaliy Khlebnikov; Jeroen C W Siero; Alex A Bhogal; Peter R Luijten; Dennis W J Klomp; Hans Hoogduin
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 4.668

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.