Literature DB >> 8915988

Protein losses in continuous renal replacement therapies.

M H Mokrzycki1, A A Kaplan.   

Abstract

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has become a popular treatment modality but may have the disadvantage of producing substantial protein losses. With use of the Biuret method, a relatively insensitive assay, dialysate/ultrafiltrate protein losses have been reported to be as high as 1.3 g/L. With CRRT outputs of up to 50 L/day, these values would amount to protein losses of up to 65 g/day. In this study, dialysate/ultrafiltrate protein losses were reanalyzed by using a highly sensitive microprotein reagent (pyrogallol red) considered to be more accurate than previously available methods. Twenty-two dialysate/ultrafiltrate samples were obtained from Amicon-20 Diafilters or Fresenius F-80 dialyzers during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) or continuous venovenous hemodialysis/hemodiafiltration (CVVHD/F). Mean hourly output for all treatments was 1637 +/- 694 mL/h. Mean protein concentration for all 22 dialysate/ultrafiltrate samples was 4.2 +/- 4.0 mg/dL. Mean dialysate/ultrafiltrate protein concentrations were similar for the Amicon 20 (3.4 +/- 4.4 mg/dL, N = 9) and the Fresenius F-80 (4.7 +/- 3.9 mg/dL, N = 13) (P = not significant). Protein losses were higher during convection-based CVVH (6.0 +/- 5.1 mg/dL, N = 10; range, 1 to 15 mg/dL) than during the mixed convection and diffusion-based CVVHD/F (2.7 +/- 1.9 mg/dL, N = 12; range, 0 to 6 mg/dL) (P = 0.049). Mean serum protein concentration at the time of dialysate/ultrafiltrate sampling was 4.7 +/- 1.8 g/dL. There was a weak, but statistically significant correlation between the dialysate/ultrafiltrate samples and the corresponding value for serum protein (r = 0.468, P < 0.03). It was concluded that protein losses during CRRT treatments are substantially lower than previously reported, are dependent on the serum protein concentration and the predominant nature of solute removal (convection versus diffusion), and can vary between 1.2 and 7.5 g/day.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8915988     DOI: 10.1681/ASN.V7102259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  5 in total

1.  Amino Acid Loss during Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration in Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Sandra N Stapel; Ruben J de Boer; Patrick J Thoral; Marc G Vervloet; Armand R J Girbes; Heleen M Oudemans-van Straaten
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.614

Review 2.  Nutritional management in the critically ill child with acute kidney injury: a review.

Authors:  Sidharth Kumar Sethi; Norma Maxvold; Timothy Bunchman; Pranaw Jha; Vijay Kher; Rupesh Raina
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.714

3.  Fluid overload and acute renal failure in pediatric stem cell transplant patients.

Authors:  Mini Michael; Ingrid Kuehnle; Stuart L Goldstein
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2003-11-22       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  The Impact of Macro-and Micronutrients on Predicting Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients Requiring Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

Authors:  Kittrawee Kritmetapak; Sadudee Peerapornratana; Nattachai Srisawat; Nicha Somlaw; Narisorn Lakananurak; Thasinas Dissayabutra; Chayanat Phonork; Asada Leelahavanichkul; Khajohn Tiranathanagul; Paweena Susantithapong; Passisd Loaveeravat; Nattachai Suwachittanont; Thaksa-On Wirotwan; Kearkiat Praditpornsilpa; Kriang Tungsanga; Somchai Eiam-Ong; Piyawan Kittiskulnam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Micronutrients in critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury - a prospective study.

Authors:  Marlies Ostermann; Jennifer Summers; Katie Lei; David Card; Dominic J Harrington; Roy Sherwood; Charles Turner; Neil Dalton; Janet Peacock; Danielle E Bear
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.