Literature DB >> 8915632

Functional and clinical results after anterior interbody lumbar fusion.

H Tiusanen1, H Hurri, S Seitsalo, K Osterman, R Harju.   

Abstract

The functional and clinical results of anterior interbody lumbar fusion were assessed in 134 patients. Functional tests included spinal mobility and isokinetic trunk muscle strength measurements. The score rating system of the Japanese Orthopaedic association (JOA) and the Oswestry disability index were used for clinical evaluation. Functional results revealed decreased spinal flexibility when compared with normal values. A reduction in physical ability was also seen in the isokinetic trunk muscle measurements. Non-union seemed to have only little effect on the functional results. Patients under 20 years at operation had the best results, but beyond this threshold results did not vary with age. The JOA rating score was 25 or more in 50% of patients. The mean Oswestry disability index was 47.8 (range 1-82) preoperatively and 20 (range 0-68) at follow-up (P < 0.001), indicating a clear decrease in subjective disability. Solid fusion was seen in 107 patients (80%) at follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8915632     DOI: 10.1007/bf00304342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  9 in total

1.  ANTERIOR DISC EXCISION AND FUSION OF THE LUMBAR VERTEBRAL BODIES. A REVIEW OF DIAGNOSTIC LEVEL TESTING, WITH OPERATIVE RESULTS IN MORE THAN SEVEN HUNDRED CASES.

Authors:  P H HARMON
Journal:  J Int Coll Surg       Date:  1963-12

2.  Transperitoneal Approach to the Intervertebral Disc in the Lumbar Area.

Authors:  J D Lane; E S Moore
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1948-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Osteoplastic anterior fusion of the lower lumbar spine in spondylolisthesis, localized spondylosis, and tuberculous spondylitis.

Authors:  M H GJESSING
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1951

4.  Results from the treatment of sciatica due to lumbar disc protrusion.

Authors:  P H HARMON
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1950-11-15       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Anterior interbody lumbar spine fusion. Analysis of Mayo Clinic series.

Authors:  R N Stauffer; M B Coventry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Anterior lumbar fusion.

Authors:  R A Calandruccio; B F Benton
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1964 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Flexibility of the spine: normative values of goniometric and tape measurements.

Authors:  H Alaranta; H Hurri; M Heliövaara; A Soukka; R Harju
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1994-09

8.  The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; J Couper; J B Davies; J P O'Brien
Journal:  Physiotherapy       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.358

9.  Objective assessment of spine function following industrial injury. A prospective study with comparison group and one-year follow-up.

Authors:  T G Mayer; R J Gatchel; N Kishino; J Keeley; P Capra; H Mayer; J Barnett; V Mooney
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Surgical anatomy, transperitoneal approach, and early postoperative complications of a ventral lumbar spine surgical model in Lewis rats.

Authors:  Sheela R Damle; Agata Krzyzanowska; Robert J Frawley; Matthew E Cunningham
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.982

2.  A prospective, randomised controlled trial of femoral ring allograft versus a titanium cage in circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with minimum 2-year clinical results.

Authors:  Patrick J McKenna; Brian J C Freeman; Robert C Mulholland; Michael P Grevitt; John K Webb; S H Mehdian
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Randomized controlled trial of postoperative exercise rehabilitation program after lumbar spine fusion: study protocol.

Authors:  Sami Tarnanen; Marko H Neva; Joost Dekker; Keijo Häkkinen; Kimmo Vihtonen; Liisa Pekkanen; Arja Häkkinen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ) as an outcome measure for patients with low back pain: reference values in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hashizume; Shin-ichi Konno; Katsushi Takeshita; Mitsuru Fukui; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Kazuhiro Chiba; Masabumi Miyamoto; Morio Matsumoto; Yuichi Kasai; Masahiko Kanamori; Shunji Matsunaga; Noboru Hosono; Tsukasa Kanchiku; Hiroshi Taneichi; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Masahiro Kanayama; Takachika Shimizu; Mamoru Kawakami
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 1.601

5.  Posterior intervertebral space debridement, annular bone grafting and instrumentation for treatment of lumbosacral tuberculosis.

Authors:  Weiwei Li; Jun Liu; Liqun Gong; Yongchun Zhou; Dapeng Duan
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability : The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

Authors:  Mitsuru Fukui; Kazuhiro Chiba; Mamoru Kawakami; Shinichi Kikuchi; Shinichi Konno; Masabumi Miyamoto; Atsushi Seichi; Tadashi Shimamura; Osamu Shirado; Toshihiko Taguchi; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Katsushi Takeshita; Toshikazu Tani; Yoshiaki Toyama; Kazuo Yonenobu; Eiji Wada; Takashi Tanaka; Yoshio Hirota
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 1.601

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.