Literature DB >> 8915561

Fluoxetine versus phenelzine in atypical depression.

A C Pande1, M Birkett, S Fechner-Bates, R F Haskett, J F Greden.   

Abstract

A study was conducted to compare the relative efficacy of fluoxetine and phenelzine in patients with mood-reactive atypical depression. Forty-two patients with atypical depression by the Columbia criteria were studied in a randomized, double-blind treatment study. Following a single-blind placebo lead-in, patients received fluoxetine 20-60 mg/day or phenelzine 45-90 mg/day for 6 weeks. Efficacy was measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Clinical Global Impression (Severity and Improvement) scales, and the Patient Global Impression (Improvement) scale. Of 42 patients randomized, 2 patients never received drugs and 2 phenelzine-treated patients dropped out prior to completion; the remainder completed the 6 weeks of the study. The rates of treatment response did not differ between groups. With a few exceptions (e.g., tremor), phenelzine produced more frequent adverse effects than fluoxetine. It was concluded that fluoxetine is as effective as phenelzine in the treatment of atypical depression, but produces fewer adverse effects and is better tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8915561     DOI: 10.1016/0006-3223(95)00628-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0006-3223            Impact factor:   13.382


  13 in total

Review 1.  Common Medications Which Lead to Unintended Alterations in Weight Gain or Organ Lipotoxicity.

Authors:  Valentina Medici; Stephen A McClave; Keith R Miller
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-01

2.  The role of monoamine oxidase inhibitors in current psychiatric practice.

Authors:  Jess G Fiedorowicz; Karen L Swartz
Journal:  J Psychiatr Pract       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.325

3.  Treatment of atypical depression with cognitive therapy or phenelzine: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  R B Jarrett; M Schaffer; D McIntire; A Witt-Browder; D Kraft; R C Risser
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1999-05

Review 4.  Stress risk factors and stress-related pathology: neuroplasticity, epigenetics and endophenotypes.

Authors:  Jason J Radley; Mohamed Kabbaj; Lauren Jacobson; Willem Heydendael; Rachel Yehuda; James P Herman
Journal:  Stress       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.493

5.  Atypical depression.

Authors:  Tanvir Singh; Kristi Williams
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2006-04

Review 6.  Fluoxetine versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression.

Authors:  A Cipriani; P Brambilla; T Furukawa; J Geddes; M Gregis; M Hotopf; L Malvini; C Barbui
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-10-19

Review 7.  Atypical depression: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Chi-Un Pae; Haresh Tharwani; David M Marks; Prakash S Masand; Ashwin A Patkar
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 8.  A comparison of active drugs for the treatment of dysthymia.

Authors:  M Silva de Lima; M Hotopf
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

9.  An open-label, rater-blinded, flexible-dose, 8-week trial of escitalopram in patients with major depressive disorder with atypical features.

Authors:  Chi-Un Pae; Prakash S Masand; Kathleen Peindl; Paolo Mannelli; Changsu Han; David M Marks; Ashwin A Patkar
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2008

10.  Reducing the Burden of Difficult-to-Treat Major Depressive Disorder: Revisiting Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitor Therapy.

Authors:  Larry Culpepper
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2013-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.