M C Thurmond1, S K Hietala. 1. Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis 95616, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the extent to which cows infected with Neospora caninum were culled, compared with noninfected cows, and to identify differences in reasons for culling between infected and noninfected cows. ANIMALS: 442 Holstein cows on a commercial dairy with 36% seroprevalence for N caninum. PROCEDURE: Culling of cows was done after first calving without knowledge of N caninum serologic status. RESULTS: Risk of a seropositive cow dying was not different from that of a seronegative cow (P = 0.50). Seropositive cows were culled 6.3 months earlier than seronegative cows, and had a 1.6 times greater risk of being culled, compared with seronegative cows (P = 0.004), after adjusting for culling risk associated with abortion. For cows culled for low milk production, culling risk for a seropositive cow was twice that for a seronegative cow (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The economic impact of N caninum infection in dairy cattle can be expected to extend beyond that for abortion alone. Costs of the disease also may include premature culling and diminished milk production. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Plans to control N caninum infection on dairies should include consideration that benefits may include reduction in premature culling and increase in milk production.
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the extent to which cows infected with Neospora caninum were culled, compared with noninfected cows, and to identify differences in reasons for culling between infected and noninfected cows. ANIMALS: 442 Holstein cows on a commercial dairy with 36% seroprevalence for N caninum. PROCEDURE: Culling of cows was done after first calving without knowledge of N caninum serologic status. RESULTS: Risk of a seropositive cow dying was not different from that of a seronegative cow (P = 0.50). Seropositive cows were culled 6.3 months earlier than seronegative cows, and had a 1.6 times greater risk of being culled, compared with seronegative cows (P = 0.004), after adjusting for culling risk associated with abortion. For cows culled for low milk production, culling risk for a seropositive cow was twice that for a seronegative cow (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The economic impact of N caninum infection in dairy cattle can be expected to extend beyond that for abortion alone. Costs of the disease also may include premature culling and diminished milk production. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Plans to control N caninum infection on dairies should include consideration that benefits may include reduction in premature culling and increase in milk production.
Authors: Lauren M Staska; Christopher J Davies; Wendy C Brown; Travis C McGuire; Carlos E Suarez; Joo Youn Park; Bruce A Mathison; Jeffrey R Abbott; Timothy V Baszler Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Angela Leepin; Angela Stüdli; Reto Brun; Chad E Stephens; David W Boykin; Andrew Hemphill Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2008-03-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: D Bacigalupe; W Basso; S G Caspe; G Moré; L Lischinsky; M L Gos; M Leunda; L Campero; D P Moore; G Schares; C M Campero; M C Venturini Journal: Parasitol Res Date: 2013-05-11 Impact factor: 2.289