Literature DB >> 8914523

Autoinducer-independent mutants of the LuxR transcriptional activator exhibit differential effects on the two lux promoters of Vibrio fischeri.

D M Sitnikov1, G S Shadel, T O Baldwin.   

Abstract

The LuxR protein is a transcriptional activator which, together with a diffusible small molecule termed the autoinducer [N-(3-oxohexanoyl)-L-homo-serine lactone], represents the primary level of regulation of the bioluminescence genes in Vibrio fischeri. LuxR, in the presence of autoinducer, activates transcription of the luxICDABEG gene cluster and both positively and negatively autoregulates transcription of the divergently oriented luxR gene, activating transcription at low levels of autoinducer, and repressing synthesis at high autoinducer concentration. Seven LuxR point mutants which activate V. fischeri lux transcription in the absence of autoinducer (LuxR*) have been characterized. The LuxR* proteins activated transcription of the bioluminescence genes to levels 1.5-40 times that achieved by wild-type LuxR without autoinducer. All of the LuxR* mutants retained responsiveness to autoinducer. However, in each case the degree of stimulation in response to autoinducer was lower than that observed for wild-type LuxR. The LuxR* proteins retained the requirement for autoinducer for autoregulation of the luxR gene. We propose that the LuxR protein exists in two conformations, an inactive form, and an active form which predominates in the presence of autoinducer. The LuxR* mutations appear to shift the equilibrium distribution of these two forms so as to increase the amount of the active form in the absence of autoinducer, while autoinducer can still convert inactive to active species. The differential effects of the LuxR* proteins at the two lux promoters suggest that LuxR stimulates PluxR transcription by a different mechanism to that used at the PluxI promoter, implying that binding of LuxR to its binding site, known to be necessary for transcriptional activation, may not be sufficient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8914523     DOI: 10.1007/bf02172408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Gen Genet        ISSN: 0026-8925


  8 in total

1.  Identification of a distantly located regulatory element in the luxD gene required for negative autoregulation of the Vibrio fischeri luxR gene.

Authors:  G S Shadel; T O Baldwin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1992-04-15       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Physiological, biochemical and genetic control of bacterial bioluminescence.

Authors:  E A Meighen; P V Dunlap
Journal:  Adv Microb Physiol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.517

Review 3.  Quorum sensing in bacteria: the LuxR-LuxI family of cell density-responsive transcriptional regulators.

Authors:  W C Fuqua; S C Winans; E P Greenberg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 4.  Transcriptional regulation of bioluminesence genes from Vibrio fischeri.

Authors:  D M Sitnikov; J B Schineller; T O Baldwin
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.501

5.  The complete nucleotide sequence of the lux regulon of Vibrio fischeri and the luxABN region of Photobacterium leiognathi and the mechanism of control of bacterial bioluminescence.

Authors:  T O Baldwin; J H Devine; R C Heckel; J W Lin; G S Shadel
Journal:  J Biolumin Chemilumin       Date:  1989-07

6.  Use of regulated cell lysis in a lethal genetic selection in Escherichia coli: identification of the autoinducer-binding region of the LuxR protein from Vibrio fischeri ATCC 7744.

Authors:  G S Shadel; R Young; T O Baldwin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Control of Vibrio fischeri lux gene transcription by a cyclic AMP receptor protein-luxR protein regulatory circuit.

Authors:  P V Dunlap; E P Greenberg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  The Vibrio fischeri LuxR protein is capable of bidirectional stimulation of transcription and both positive and negative regulation of the luxR gene.

Authors:  G S Shadel; T O Baldwin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.490

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Implications of rewiring bacterial quorum sensing.

Authors:  Eric L Haseltine; Frances H Arnold
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  The LuxR family quorum-sensing activator MrtR requires its cognate autoinducer for dimerization and activation but not for protein folding.

Authors:  Menghua Yang; Jennifer L Giel; Tao Cai; Zengtao Zhong; Jun Zhu
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Cell-to-cell communication in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: they may be talking, but who's listening?

Authors:  C Fuqua; E P Greenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Amino-terminal protein fusions to the TraR quorum-sensing transcription factor enhance protein stability and autoinducer-independent activity.

Authors:  Yunrong Chai; Stephen C Winans
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Amino acid residues in LuxR critical for its mechanism of transcriptional activation during quorum sensing in Vibrio fischeri.

Authors:  A E Trott; A M Stevens
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Dynamics of the quorum sensing switch: stochastic and non-stationary effects.

Authors:  Marc Weber; Javier Buceta
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2013-01-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.