Literature DB >> 8914312

Relationships of intensity discrimination to sensation and loudness levels: dependence on sound frequency.

E Ozimek1, J J Zwislocki.   

Abstract

The main purpose of the experiments described in this article was to establish the frequency dependence of auditory intensity jnd's (just noticeable differences) for pure tones as functions of loudness level (LL). For this purpose, two sets of experiments were performed. In the first, the jnd's were measured as functions of sensation level (SL) at sound frequencies of 0.125, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 kHz. The SLs were set at 10, 20, 40, 60, and 80 dB in a random order. In the second, LLs corresponding to the set of the SL at 1 kHz were obtained, and the relationship of the jnd's to LL was determined. We investigated to what extent the constant loudness-constant jnd relationship found previously intrafrequency can be applied interfrequency. The detection experiments were performed with a continuous-pedestal paradigm and an adaptive two-alternative, forced-choice (2AFC) procedure that converges on 75% of correct responses. We found that the jnd's in dB plotted versus SL decreased roughly according to power functions, the rate of decrease depending on sound frequency. The jnd's increased with sound frequency at low SLs but became practically constant at high SLs. According to the second experiment, the jnd's followed approximately the same function of LL at all sound frequencies, except for a multiplicative constant, irrespective of the slope of the loudness level function. Thus, the constant loudness-constant jnd relationship appears to apply interfrequency except for a multiplicative constant that, with the continuous-pedestal paradigm, grew monotonically with the frequency.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8914312     DOI: 10.1121/1.416993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  On a psychophysical transformed-rule up and down method converging on a 75% level of correct responses.

Authors:  J J Zwislocki; E M Relkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Tuning of human modulation filters is carrier-frequency dependent.

Authors:  Andrew J R Simpson; Joshua D Reiss; David McAlpine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Sensorimotor Integration Can Enhance Auditory Perception.

Authors:  John C Myers; Jeffrey R Mock; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Intra-Auditory Integration Improves Motor Performance and Synergy in an Accurate Multi-Finger Pressing Task.

Authors:  Kyung Koh; Hyun Joon Kwon; Yang Sun Park; Tim Kiemel; Ross H Miller; Yoon Hyuk Kim; Joon-Ho Shin; Jae Kun Shim
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Intra-auditory integration between pitch and loudness in humans: Evidence of super-optimal integration at moderate uncertainty in auditory signals.

Authors:  Kyung Koh; Hyun Joon Kwon; Tim Kiemel; Ross H Miller; Yang Sun Park; Min Joo Kim; Young Ha Kwon; Yoon Hyuk Kim; Jae Kun Shim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.