Literature DB >> 8914175

Recommended clinical practices for maximizing peritoneal dialysis clearances.

P Blake1, J M Burkart, D N Churchill, J Daugirdas, T Depner, R J Hamburger, A R Hull, S M Korbet, J Moran, K D Nolph.   

Abstract

Data from the Canada-U.S.A. (CANUSA) Study have recently confirmed a long-suspected linkage between total clearance and patient survival in peritoneal dialysis (PD). Recognizing that what we have historically accepted as adequate PD simply is not, the Ad Hoc Committee on Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy met in January, 1996. This committee of invited experts was convened by Baxter Healthcare Corporation to prepare a consensus statement that provides clinical recommendations for achieving clearance guidelines for peritoneal dialysis. Through an analysis of 806 PD patients, the group concluded that adequate clearance delivered with PD can be achieved in almost all patients if the prescription is individualized according to the patient's body surface area, amount of residual renal function, and peritoneal membrane transport characteristics. Use of 2.5 L to 3.0 L fill volumes, the addition of an extra exchange, and giving automated peritoneal dialysis patients a "wet" day are all options to consider when increasing weekly creatinine clearance and KT/V. Rather than specify a single clearance or KT/V target, the recommended clinical practice is to provide the most dialysis that can be delivered to the individual patient, within the constraints of social and clinical circumstances, quality of life, life-style, and cost. The challenge to PD practitioners is to make prescription management an integral part of everyday patient management. This includes assessment of peritoneal membrane permeability, measurement of dialysis and residual renal clearance, and adjustment of the dialysis prescription when indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8914175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  6 in total

1.  Ultrafiltration and dialysis adequacy with various daily schedules of dialysis fluids.

Authors:  Ramón Paniagua; Malgorzata Debowska; María-de-Jesús Ventura; Marcela Ávila-Díaz; Carmen Prado-Uribe; Carmen Mora; Elvia García-López; Bengt Lindholm; Jacek Waniewski
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Automated peritoneal dialysis prescriptions for enhancing sodium and fluid removal: a predictive analysis of optimized, patient-specific dwell times for the day period.

Authors:  Alp Akonur; Steven Guest; James A Sloand; John K Leypoldt
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 3.  Can peritoneal dialysis be used as a long term therapy for end stage renal disease?

Authors:  Michele Giannattasio; Michele Buemi; Flavia Caputo; Giusto Viglino; Enrico Verrina
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Peritoneal dialysis in the nursing home.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Sharron Izatt; Chris Dalglish; Sarbjit Vanita Jassal; Joanne Bargman; Stephen Vas; Effie Tziviskou; Dimitrios Oreopoulos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Metabolic factors contribute to T-cell inhibition in the ovarian cancer ascites.

Authors:  Yueqing Gong; Jianling Yang; Yan Wang; Lixiang Xue; Junjie Wang
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Remote monitoring in peritoneal dialysis: benefits on clinical outcomes and on quality of life.

Authors:  Sabrina Milan Manani; Michele Baretta; Anna Giuliani; Grazia Maria Virzì; Francesca Martino; Carlo Crepaldi; Claudio Ronco
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 4.393

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.