Literature DB >> 8913754

The speciation history of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives: inferences from DNA sequence variation at the period locus.

R L Wang1, J Hey.   

Abstract

Thirty-five period locus sequences from Drosophila pseudoobscura and its siblings species, D. p. bogotana, D. persimilis, and D. miranda, were studied. A large amount of variation was found within D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis, consistent with histories of large effective population sizes. D. p. bogotana, however, has a severe reduction in diversity. Combined analysis of per with two other loci, in both D. p. bogotana and D. pseudoobscura, strongly suggest this reduction is due to recent directional selection at or near per within D. p. bogotana. Since D. p. bogotana is highly variable and shares variation with D. pseudoobscura at other loci, the low level of variation at per within D. p. bogotana can not be explained by a small effective population size or by speciation via founder event. Both D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis have considerable intraspecific gene flow. A large portion of one D. persimilis sequence appears to have arisen via introgression from D. pseudoobscura. The time of this event appears to be well after the initial separation of these two species. The estimated times since speciation are one mya for D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis and 2 mya since the formation of D. miranda.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8913754      PMCID: PMC1207605     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  35 in total

1.  Genetics of natural populations. XXXI. Genetics of an isolated marginal population of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  T DOBZHANSKY; A S HUNTER; O PAVLOVSKY; B SPASSKY; B WALLACE
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Estimating the recombination parameter of a finite population model without selection.

Authors:  R R Hudson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Statistical properties of the number of recombination events in the history of a sample of DNA sequences.

Authors:  R R Hudson; N L Kaplan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Behaviour modification by in vitro mutagenesis of a variable region within the period gene of Drosophila.

Authors:  Q Yu; H V Colot; C P Kyriacou; J C Hall; M Rosbash
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Apr 23-29       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila.

Authors:  J H McDonald; M Kreitman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Phase shifting of the circadian clock by induction of the Drosophila period protein.

Authors:  I Edery; J E Rutila; M Rosbash
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-01-14       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Reproductive isolation and the period gene of Drosophila.

Authors:  M G Ritchie; C P Kyriacou
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Circadian rhythm mutations in Drosophila melanogaster affect short-term fluctuations in the male's courtship song.

Authors:  C P Kyriacou; J C Hall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  27 in total

1.  Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species.

Authors:  M A Noor; K L Grams; L A Bertucci; J Reiland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The causes of phylogenetic conflict in a classic Drosophila species group.

Authors:  Carlos A Machado; Jody Hey
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Multilocus methods for estimating population sizes, migration rates and divergence time, with applications to the divergence of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.

Authors:  Jody Hey; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The evolution of antifungal peptides in Drosophila.

Authors:  Francis M Jiggins; Kang-Wook Kim
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Decreased diversity but increased substitution rate in host mtDNA as a consequence of Wolbachia endosymbiont infection.

Authors:  D DeWayne Shoemaker; Kelly A Dyer; Mike Ahrens; Kevin McAbee; John Jaenike
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Conserved motifs and dynamic aspects of the terminal inverted repeat organization within Bari-like transposons.

Authors:  Roberta Moschetti; Sarantis Chlamydas; Renè Massimiliano Marsano; Ruggiero Caizzi
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.291

7.  Integration of populations and differentiation of species.

Authors:  Loren H Rieseberg; Sheri A Church; Carrie L Morjan
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 10.151

8.  Molecular evolution of Drosophila Cdc6, an essential DNA replication-licensing gene, suggests an adaptive choice of replication origins.

Authors:  Benjamin L Wiggins; Harmit S Malik
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.160

9.  Gene flow and natural selection in the origin of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives.

Authors:  R L Wang; J Wakeley; J Hey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  A complex selection signature at the human AVPR1B gene.

Authors:  Rachele Cagliani; Matteo Fumagalli; Uberto Pozzoli; Stefania Riva; Matteo Cereda; Giacomo P Comi; Linda Pattini; Nereo Bresolin; Manuela Sironi
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.