Literature DB >> 8913343

Identification of critical extracellular loop residues involved in alpha 1-adrenergic receptor subtype-selective antagonist binding.

M M Zhao1, J Hwa, D M Perez.   

Abstract

alpha 1-Adrenergic receptor (AR) subtypes mediate many effects of the sympathetic nervous system. Although structurally similar, the three cloned subtypes (alpha 1a-AR, alpha 1b-AR, and alpha 1d-AR) bind a series of ligands with different relative potencies. This is particularly true for the alpha 1a-AR, which recognizes a number of ligands with 10-100-fold higher affinity than the alpha 1b or alpha 1d subtypes. Because ligands are hypothesized to bind to receptor residues that are located in the transmembrane (TM) spanning domains, subtype differences in ligand recognition are likely the result of differences in the binding properties of nonconserved TM residues. We previously reported on the identification of two TM residues in the alpha 1b-AR that converted the agonist binding profile entirely to that of the alpha 1a-AR when mutated to corresponding alpha 1a-AR residues. We now report on the determinants of antagonist selectivity between these two alpha 1-AR subtypes. Construction of a chimera in which the entire fifth TM and a portion of the putative second extracellular loop of the hamster alpha 1b-AR was replaced with the corresponding region of the rat alpha 1a-AR revealed that the chimera accounted for all of the higher binding affinity (8-29-fold) seen in the alpha 1a-AR for two antagonists, phentolamine and WB4101. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we further analyzed individual point mutations making up this chimera. We found that three adjacent residues, which were located on the extracellular loop of the fifth TM, are fully responsible for this higher antagonist binding affinity in the alpha 1a-AR. These three point mutations (G196Q, V1971, T198N) in the alpha 1b-AR were additive and sufficient in their effects on changing antagonist-binding profiles to that of the alpha 1a-AR. Reversal of these three residues in the alpha 1a-AR to their corresponding residues in the alpha 1b-AR completely reversed the antagonist affinity to wild-type alpha 1b-AR values. To aid in molecular modeling, the use of organic chemicals that mimic key structures of the antagonists were used in competitive ligand-binding studies with the mutated receptors. These results indicated the orientation of both phentolamine and WB4101 in the alpha 1-AR binding pocket. Together, the data indicate that alpha 1-antagonists may bind near the surface of the receptor, much like the peptide hormone receptors, and not deep within the TM regions, where the ligand-binding pocket was first proposed and identified for alpha 1 agonists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8913343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0026-895X            Impact factor:   4.436


  20 in total

Review 1.  G protein-coupled receptor drug discovery: implications from the crystal structure of rhodopsin.

Authors:  J Ballesteros; K Palczewski
Journal:  Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel       Date:  2001-09

2.  Molecular dynamics simulations of bovine rhodopsin: influence of protonation states and different membrane-mimicking environments.

Authors:  Birgit Schlegel; Wolfgang Sippl; Hans-Dieter Höltje
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 3.  Structure-function of alpha1-adrenergic receptors.

Authors:  Dianne M Perez
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 5.858

4.  Ligand-specific conformation of extracellular loop-2 in the angiotensin II type 1 receptor.

Authors:  Hamiyet Unal; Rajaganapathi Jagannathan; Manjunatha B Bhat; Sadashiva S Karnik
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Lifting the lid on GPCRs: the role of extracellular loops.

Authors:  M Wheatley; D Wootten; M T Conner; J Simms; R Kendrick; R T Logan; D R Poyner; J Barwell
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 6.  What can crystal structures of aminergic receptors tell us about designing subtype-selective ligands?

Authors:  Mayako Michino; Thijs Beuming; Prashant Donthamsetti; Amy Hauck Newman; Jonathan A Javitch; Lei Shi
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 25.468

7.  Conserved structural, pharmacological and functional properties among the three human and five zebrafish alpha 2-adrenoceptors.

Authors:  Jori O Ruuskanen; Jonne Laurila; Henri Xhaard; Ville-Veikko Rantanen; Karoliina Vuoriluoto; Siegfried Wurster; Anne Marjamäki; Minna Vainio; Mark S Johnson; Mika Scheinin
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Role of the extracellular loops of G protein-coupled receptors in ligand recognition: a molecular modeling study of the human P2Y1 receptor.

Authors:  S Moro; C Hoffmann; K A Jacobson
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-03-23       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Involvement of the first transmembrane segment of human α(2) -adrenoceptors in the subtype-selective binding of chlorpromazine, spiperone and spiroxatrine.

Authors:  J M M Laurila; G Wissel; H Xhaard; J O Ruuskanen; M S Johnson; M Scheinin
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 8.739

10.  Point mutations in the second extracellular loop of the histamine H2 receptor do not affect the species-selective activity of guanidine-type agonists.

Authors:  Hendrik Preuss; Prasanta Ghorai; Anja Kraus; Stefan Dove; Armin Buschauer; Roland Seifert
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 3.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.