Literature DB >> 8913197

Comparison of peripheral Ia and corticomotoneuronal composite EPSPs in human motoneurons.

K E Jones1, B Calancie, A Hall, P Bawa.   

Abstract

The effects of excitatory inputs arising from Ia afferent and corticomotoneuronal volleys on repetitively firing flexor carpi radialis (FCR) motoneurons were compared in normal human subjects. Peripheral (Ia) volleys were produced by transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the median nerve and by mechanical taps to the FCR tendon. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to activate the corticomotoneuronal pathway. The duration of the excitatory response peaks measured from peri-stimulus time histograms (PSTHs) and the time course of the response trajectories were both taken to reflect the shapes of the underlying composite excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSP)s acting upon that motoneuron. The duration of excitatory response peaks for the H-reflex and the first sub-peak (SP1) of the motor unit's response to TMS were similar and were typically less than those arising from tendon taps. The response trajectories, which measure the excitability of the motoneuron during different phases of the afterhyperpolarization, overlapped for H-reflex and SP1 responses, but were different for tendon tap inputs. Our results indicate that the SP1 response of a motoneuron to TMS input and its response to near-synchronous Ia afferent activation are mediated by composite EPSPs with similar rise times. We suggest that a similar spatial distribution of synaptic boutons for both Ia and corticomotoneuronal input to motoneurons innervating FCR is likely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8913197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  4 in total

1.  Responses of single motor units in human masseter to transcranial magnetic stimulation of either hemisphere.

Authors:  Sophie L Pearce; Timothy S Miles; Philip D Thompson; Michael A Nordstrom
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Can prepared responses be stored subcortically?

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Romeo Chua; J Timothy Inglis; David J Sanderson; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Differential effects of startle on reaction time for finger and arm movements.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Romeo Chua; J Timothy Inglis; David J Sanderson; Ian M Franks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Recruitment gain of spinal motor neuron pools in cat and human.

Authors:  J B Nielsen; H Morita; R Wenzelburger; G Deuschl; J-P Gossard; H Hultborn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.