Literature DB >> 8912234

Effects of exposure to 16.7 Hz magnetic fields on urinary 6-hydroxymelatonin sulfate excretion of Swiss railway workers.

D H Pfluger1, C E Minder.   

Abstract

The aim of our study was to examine the effects of 16.7 Hz electromagnetic-field exposure on pineal melatonin production in healthy humans. The study was based on comparing urinary 6-hydroxymelatonin sulfate (6-OHMS) levels of 108 male railway workers between leisure periods and days following the start of service on electrically powered engines (66 engineers) or working beneath transmission lines (42 railway employees such as train attendants and station managers; controls). A repeated measures design was used, i.e., each volunteer served as his own control. The exposure averaged 20 muTesla in the most exposed workers and around 1 muTesla in the least exposed. Apart from magnetic exposure the workers were subject to a shift work schedule with daily advances between 15 min and 1 hr. Melatonin was assessed by sampling urinary 6-OHMS both in the morning and the early evening. Evening 6-OHMS values appeared to be lowered by a factor of 0.81 (95%CI: 0.73-0.90) during work days compared to leisure days among engine drivers, but not in the controls. The lowering was not confined to certain types of shift work such as early, normal, or late shifts. During subsequent leisure periods evening values recovered significantly, mean ratio = 1.27 (95%CI: 1.03-1.56), i.e., the effects appeared to be reversible. In contrast, morning 6-OHMS samples of engineers and controls did not differ much between work and leisure days. There was, however, a tendency for a rebound of morning values in a leisure period following a work period both for engineers and controls. The observed pattern appears to be in line with predictions of the "phase response curve." No evidence for a dose-response relation was found. The results support the hypothesis that 16.7 Hz magnetic fields alter 6-OHMS excretion in humans exposed to magnetic fields. An alternative explanation that cannot be excluded in this study is that the difference between engineers and controls is due to differential exposure to day light at work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8912234     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-079x.1996.tb00275.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pineal Res        ISSN: 0742-3098            Impact factor:   13.007


  11 in total

1.  Exposure to electromagnetic fields and suicide among electric utility workers: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  E van Wijngaarden; D A Savitz; R C Kleckner; J Cai; D Loomis
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Exposure to electromagnetic fields and suicide among electric utility workers: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  E van Wijngaarden; D A Savitz; R C Kleckner; J Cai; D Loomis
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-08

3.  Skeletal muscle HSP72 and norepinephrine response to static magnetic field in rat.

Authors:  H Abdelmelek; A Molnar; S Servais; J M Cottet-Emard; J M Pequignot; R Favier; M Sakly
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Effects of power frequency electromagnetic fields on melatonin and sleep in the rat.

Authors:  Jeff Dyche; A Michael Anch; Kethera A J Fogler; David W Barnett; Cecil Thomas
Journal:  Emerg Health Threats J       Date:  2012-04-20

5.  Examination of the melatonin hypothesis in women exposed at night to EMF or bright light.

Authors:  C Graham; M R Cook; M M Gerkovich; A Sastre
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 6.  The influence of electromagnetic pollution on living organisms: historical trends and forecasting changes.

Authors:  Grzegorz Redlarski; Bogdan Lewczuk; Arkadiusz Żak; Andrzej Koncicki; Marek Krawczuk; Janusz Piechocki; Kazimierz Jakubiuk; Piotr Tojza; Jacek Jaworski; Dominik Ambroziak; Łukasz Skarbek; Dawid Gradolewski
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Influence of electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields on the circadian system: current stage of knowledge.

Authors:  Bogdan Lewczuk; Grzegorz Redlarski; Arkadiusz Zak; Natalia Ziółkowska; Barbara Przybylska-Gornowicz; Marek Krawczuk
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Occupational electromagnetic field exposures associated with sleep quality: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Guangdi Chen; Yifeng Pan; Zexin Chen; Wen Jin; Chuan Sun; Chunjing Chen; Xuanjun Dong; Kun Chen; Zhengping Xu; Shanchun Zhang; Yunxian Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The effects of extremely low-frequency magnetic fields on melatonin and cortisol, two marker rhythms of the circadian system.

Authors:  Yvan Touitou; Brahim Selmaoui
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.986

10.  Severe Cognitive Dysfunction and Occupational Extremely Low Frequency Magnetic Field Exposure among Elderly Mexican Americans.

Authors:  Zoreh Davanipour; Chiu-Chen Tseng; Pey-Jiuan Lee; Kyriakos S Markides; Eugene Sobel
Journal:  Br J Med Med Res       Date:  2014-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.