Literature DB >> 8911873

Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide+methotrexate+fluorouracil in patients with node-positive breast cancer.

A Messori1, P Becagli, S Trippoli, E Tendi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The analysis of published survival curves can be used as the basis for incremental cost-effectiveness analyses in which two treatments are compared with each other in terms of cost per life year saved. In patients with node-positive breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide+ methotrexate+fluorouracil has been reported to improve survival in comparison with patients who are not given this treatment.
METHODS: To assess the pharmacoeconomic profile of this adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimen in terms of cost per life-year gained, we conducted an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis in which the Gompertz model was used to calculate the lifetime estimate of the patient-years gained by treated subjects compared to controls.
RESULTS: Using data from a published, controlled long-term trial involving 207 patients treated with cyclophosphamide+methotrexate+fluorouracil and 179 controls, we estimated that this adjuvant chemotherapy improved life expectancy by 357 patient-years per 100 subjects. Direct costs, which were almost exclusively related to the administration of chemotherapy, were estimated to be US $159,516 per 100 patients. On the basis of these data, adjuvant chemotherapy was found to imply an incremental cost of US $447 per life-year saved.
CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness ratio of adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide+methotrexate+fluorouracil in patients with node-positive breast cancer seems to be particularly favourable in comparison with estimates of cost per life-year saved previously calculated for other types of pharmacological intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8911873     DOI: 10.1007/s002280050169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  6 in total

Review 1.  Current controversies in the application of meta-analysis (with special reference to oncological treatments)

Authors:  A Messori
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1997-06

2.  Drug treatments for maintaining remission in Crohn's disease. A lifetime cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  G Trallori; A Messori
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Cost effectiveness of riluzole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Italian Cooperative Group for the Study of Meta-Analysis and the Osservatorio SIFO sui Farmaci.

Authors:  A Messori; S Trippoli; P Becagli; G Zaccara
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Lifetime cost-utility analysis of patients with refractory epilepsy treated with adjunctive topiramate therapy : cost-effectiveness in refractory epilepsy.

Authors:  S Maltoni; A Messori
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  Cost-utility analysis of adjuvant goserelin (Zoladex) and adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Tsui Fen Cheng; Jung Der Wang; Wu Ching Uen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Pharmacoeconomic analysis of adjuvant oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-FU/LV in Dukes' C colon cancer: the X-ACT trial.

Authors:  J Cassidy; J-Y Douillard; C Twelves; J J McKendrick; W Scheithauer; I Bustová; P G Johnston; K Lesniewski-Kmak; S Jelic; G Fountzilas; F Coxon; E Díaz-Rubio; T S Maughan; A Malzyner; O Bertetto; A Beham; A Figer; P Dufour; K K Patel; W Cowell; L P Garrison
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.