Literature DB >> 8911430

Facility and area variation affecting the use of physical restraints in nursing homes.

C D Phillips1, C Hawes, V Mor, B E Fries, J N Morris, M E Nennstiel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Various individual characteristics increase a nursing home resident's likelihood of being mechanically restrained. However, there is not good information on the role played by facility characteristics and geographic area in determining the likelihood of physical restraint use. This study investigates the importance of individual, facility, and area indicators in determining the likelihood of restraint use.
METHODS: This research uses data on 2,000 nursing home residents receiving care in more than 250 nursing homes in 10 different areas. Resident-level data were collected in 1990 by research nurses using the Minimum Data Set for Nursing Home Resident Assessment and Care Screening. Facility-level data were gathered by telephone interviews with facility staff. The relations among the variables were investigated using contingency tables and multivariate logistic regression models.
RESULTS: Controlling for residents' physical and cognitive function, facility characteristics and location had a significant impact on restraint practices. Those facilities with low nurse staffing were more likely to restrain residents. Furthermore, controlling for these factors, restraint practices varied significantly across the geographic areas in the study.
CONCLUSIONS: Like hospitals, nursing homes exhibit significant interfacility and regional variation in their clinical practices. Future analyses of nursing home care might benefit from considering both factors in much finer detail.

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8911430     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199611000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  8 in total

1.  Use of physical restraints and psychotropic medications in Alzheimer special care units in nursing homes.

Authors:  C D Phillips; K M Spry; P D Sloane; C Hawes
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Time to and predictors of dual incontinence in older nursing home admissions.

Authors:  Donna Z Bliss; Olga V Gurvich; Lynn E Eberly; Susan Harms
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 2.696

3.  Nursing effort and quality of care for nursing home residents.

Authors:  Greg Arling; Robert L Kane; Christine Mueller; Julie Bershadsky; Howard B Degenholtz
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2007-10

4.  Advance care planning in nursing homes: pre- and post-Patient Self-Determination Act.

Authors:  N G Castle; V Mor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Correlations of nursing home characteristics with prescription of osteoporosis medications.

Authors:  Seema Parikh; M Alan Brookhart; Margaret Stedman; Jerry Avorn; Helen Mogun; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Does organisational culture influence prescribing in care homes for older people? A new direction for research.

Authors:  Carmel M Hughes; Kate Lapane; Margaret C Watson; Huw T O Davies
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Analysis of Racial and Ethnic Disparities as Possible Risk Factors for Development of Incontinence by Nursing Home Residents.

Authors:  Donna Z Bliss; Olga V Gurvich; Kay Savik; Lynn E Eberly; Susan Harms; Jean F Wyman; Christine Mueller; Judith Garrard; Beth Virnig
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.228

8.  Physical restraint use among nursing home residents: A comparison of two data collection methods.

Authors:  Danielle Laurin; Philippe Voyer; René Verreault; Pierre J Durand
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2004-10-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.