Literature DB >> 8910173

Lidocaine plasma levels following two techniques of obturator nerve block.

P G Atanassoff1, B M Weiss, S J Brull.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To assess plasma levels and the potential toxicity of lidocaine following two different approaches to the obtruator nerve.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, clinical trial.
SETTING: Operating rooms of a university hospital. PATIENTS: 45 ASA physical status I, II and III patients over 40 years of age, and undergoing transurethral resection of urinary bladder tumors.
INTERVENTIONS: A prospective study compared lidocaine plasma levels following direct and indirect (3-in-1) obturator nerve block using lidocaine 1.5% plus 1:200,000 epinephrine. Patients with unilateral urinary bladder tumors were randomized to receive direct obturator nerve block with 15 ml of lidocaine (Group A, n = 20), while those with bilateral tumors received a bilateral direct obturator nerve block with 30 ml (2 x 15 ml) of lidocaine (Group B, n = 12). A third group of patients with unilateral bladder tumors received 3-in-1 indirect) obturator nerve block with 40 ml of lidocaine (Group C, n = 17). Plasma lidocaine concentration was determined every 5 minutes for 30 minutes, and at 45, 60, and 90 minutes after the block.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In Group A, mean (+/- SD) peak plasma lidocaine level of 1.35 +/- 0.5 micrograms/ml (range 0.61 to 2.41 micrograms/ml) occurred 45 minutes after injection. In Group B, a peak of 3.63 +/- 2.07 micrograms/ml (0.75 to 7.21 micrograms/ml) occurred 15 minutes after injection. Mean peak level in Group C of 2.08 +/- 0.77 micrograms/ml (0.84 to 3.21 micrograms/ml) occurred 60 minutes after injection Lidocaine concentrations were significantly higher in Groups B and C than in Group A, and they were higher in Group B than in Group C. No patient had any signs of symptoms of local anesthetic toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a lower total dose of lidocaine administered (450 mg), higher mean and peak plasma levels were reached sooner with bilateral direct obturator nerve block compared with the indirect obturator nerve block (600 mg), indicating a faster blood absorption of lidocaine following direct block. Both types of obturator nerve block prevented adductor muscle contraction in a large percentage of cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8910173     DOI: 10.1016/s0952-8180(96)00117-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  5 in total

1.  Obturator nerve block transurethral surgery for bladder cancer: comparison of inguinal and intravesical approaches: prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  F Hızlı; G Argun; I Güney; O Güven; A I Arık; S Başay; H Günaydın; H Başar; A Köşüş
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  An assessment of the clinical utility of transperineal urethrosphincteric block (TUSB) in outpatient rigid cystoscopy: a single-blind, randomized study.

Authors:  Adel Al-Hunayan; Elijah O Kehinde; Aida Shihab-Eldeen; Hamdy Abdulhalim; Ahmad Al-Saraf
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Comparison of the success rate of inguinal approach with classical pubic approach for obturator nerve block in patients undergoing TURB.

Authors:  Youn Yi Jo; Eunkyeong Choi; Hae Keum Kil
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-08-23

4.  Effectiveness of spinal anesthesia combined with obturator nerve blockade in preventing adductor muscle contraction during transurethral resection of bladder tumor.

Authors:  Cyrus Emir Alavi; Seyed Alaeddin Asgari; Siavash Falahatkar; Siamak Rimaz; Mohammadreza Naghipour; Hossein Khoshrang; Mehdi Jafari; Nadia Herfeh
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-12-01

5.  Over 500 obturator nerve blocks in the lithotomy position during transurethral resection of bladder tumor.

Authors:  Karolina Pladzyk; Lidia Jureczko; Tomasz Lazowski
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2012-06-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.