Literature DB >> 8910108

The stability of maxillary advancement using Le Fort I osteotomy with and without genial bone grafting.

P D Waite1, T J Tejera, B Anucul.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether better stability is achieved with genial bone grafts and four-plate rigid fixation for large advancement Le Fort I osteotomies of the maxilla than with nongrafted osteotomies. We analyzed radiographic data on 22 patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. All patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement, 11 patients without bone grafts and 11 patients with bone grafts harvested from the mandibular symphyseal area. Bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomies and genial tubercle advancements were also performed in all patients. Patients in the genial bone-grafted group had a mean advancement (surgical change) of 9.7 mm and a mean relapse (postsurgical change) of 0.7 mm (7%). Patients who had rigid fixation alone had a mean advancement of 10 mm and a mean relapse of 1.8 mm (18%). It is concluded that the stability with genial bone grafts to the lateral wall of the maxilla with four-plate rigid fixation was better than in the nongrafted group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8910108     DOI: 10.1016/s0901-5027(06)80052-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  2 in total

1.  Are bioresorbable polylactate devices comparable to titanium devices for stabilizing Le Fort I advancement?

Authors:  G H Blakey; E Rossouw; T A Turvey; C Phillips; W R Proffit; R P White
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Closure of anterior open bites with mandibular surgery: advantages and disadvantages of this approach.

Authors:  Joseph E Van Sickels; Aaron Wallender
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-09-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.