Literature DB >> 8909888

Auditory brain stem response generation by parallel pathways: differential maturation of axonal conduction time and synaptic transmission.

C W Ponton1, J K Moore, J J Eggermont.   

Abstract

In attempting to correlate developmental anatomical data with electrophysiological data on maturation of the auditory brain stem response (ABR), a model of ABR generation was necessary to match neuroanatomical structures to ABR components. This model has been developed by reviewing quantitative studies of human brain stem nuclei, results of intrasurgical recordings, studies of correlation of pathology with ABR waveform alterations, and findings from direct stimulation of the human cochlear nuclei through a brain stem implant device. Based on this material, it was assumed that waves I and II are generated peripherally in the auditory nerve and that waves III, IV, and V are generated centrally, i.e., by brain stem structures. It was further assumed that wave III is generated by axons emerging from the cochlear nuclei in the ventral acoustic stria and that waves IV and V reflect activity in parallel subpopulations of these ascending axons at a higher brain stem level. Beyond the cochlear nucleus, the largest component of the brain stem auditory pathway consists of axons projecting without interruption from the cochlear nuclei to the contralateral lateral lemniscus and inferior colliculus. In the proposed model of ABR generation, the III-IV interwave interval is assumed to reflect only axonal conduction in this asynaptic pathway. Electrophysiological data from infants indicate that the III-IV interwave interval becomes adult-like by the time of term birth. The second largest component of the brain stem auditory pathway is the bilateral projection through the medial olivary nucleus. The model assumes that activity in this monosynaptic pathway, consisting of axonal conduction time plus one synaptic delay, is reflected in the III-V interwave interval. If both of the preceding assumptions are true, the IV-V interwave interval represents the difference between the two pathways, i.e., the time of transmission across one synapse. The electrophysiological ABR data indicates that the IV-V interval does not mature until one year of age. It is also possible to apply this model to the peripherally generated portion of the ABR. The I-II interwave interval, assumed to solely represent conduction in VIIIth nerve axons, is adult-like before the time of term birth. The II-III interval, presumed to contain a synapse in the cochlear nuclear complex, does not reach an adult level until between 1 and 2 yr postnatal age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8909888     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199610000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  21 in total

1.  Fitting model of ABR age dependency in a clinical population of normal hearing children.

Authors:  S Coenraad; T van Immerzeel; L J Hoeve; A Goedegebure
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Functional modeling of the human auditory brainstem response to broadband stimulation.

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Hari M Bharadwaj; Golbarg Mehraei; Christopher A Shera; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effects of aggressive vs. conservative phototherapy on the brainstem auditory evoked responses of extremely-low-birth-weight infants.

Authors:  Robert E Lasky; Michael W Church; Mark S Orlando; Brenda H Morris; Nehal A Parikh; Jon E Tyson; Georgia E McDavid; William Oh; David K Stevenson; Krisa P Van Meurs; Ronnie Guillet; Dale L Phelps
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.756

4.  Click-evoked auditory brainstem responses and autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Nicole M Talge; Brooke M Tudor; Paul R Kileny
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 5.216

Review 5.  A behavioral framework to guide research on central auditory development and plasticity.

Authors:  Dan H Sanes; Sarah M N Woolley
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Peripheral auditory processing changes seasonally in Gambel's white-crowned sparrow.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras; Eliot Brenowitz; Edwin W Rubel
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Ensuring accuracy of the pediatric hearing aid fitting.

Authors:  André Marcoux; Martin Hansen
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2003

8.  Identifying a window of vulnerability during fetal development in a maternal iron restriction model.

Authors:  Camelia Mihaila; Jordan Schramm; Frederick G Strathmann; Dawn L Lee; Robert M Gelein; Anne E Luebke; Margot Mayer-Pröschel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Incidence and clinical value of prolonged I-V interval in NICU infants after failing neonatal hearing screening.

Authors:  S Coenraad; L J Hoeve; A Goedegebure
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  A comparative study of age-related hearing loss in wild type and insulin-like growth factor I deficient mice.

Authors:  Raquel Riquelme; Rafael Cediel; Julio Contreras; Rodriguez-de la Rosa Lourdes; Silvia Murillo-Cuesta; Catalina Hernandez-Sanchez; Jose M Zubeldia; Sebastian Cerdan; Isabel Varela-Nieto
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.856

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.