OBJECTIVE: To evaluate two- or three-dose "mixed" regimens of Haemophilusinfluenzae type b conjugate vaccines in the priming series. DESIGN: Two randomized clinical trials with 140 and 181 infants, respectively. SETTING: Private practices in New Orleans and Chicago. METHODS: In trial I, infants received one of four regimens. Two were recommended regimens for polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP)-meningococcal protein conjugate (M) and PRP-tetanus toxoid conjugate (T). Two mixed regimens consisted of M at 2 months followed by two doses of T or PRP-diphtheria toxoid conjugate (D) at 4 and 6 months. Trial II consisted of three groups. Two were recommended regimens for M and T. The third was a two-dose mixed regimen consisting of M at 2 months and T at 4 months. Parents were interviewed and instructed to record side effects after each vaccination. Serum was assayed for H influenzae type b anticapsular antibody (anti-PRP). RESULTS: Minor differences in safety profiles likely reflected alpha error. In trial I, M (lot 0884T, one of several known to have had decreased immunogenicity), probably primed for substantial increase in serum antibody when D or T was given at 4 and 6 months. In trial II, infants who received the two-dose mixed regimen (M from immunogenic lot 0116W at 2 months and T at 4 months) had a significantly higher mean area under the curve than recipients of the three-dose TTT regimen when antibody concentration was plotted against age, although the geometric mean anti-PRP antibody concentration for the MT-recipients was significantly lower at 7 months. CONCLUSIONS: M used in trial I may have primed infants despite poor immunogenicity. The two-dose mixed regimen (MT-) in trial II produced a mean anti-PRP antibody concentration with higher sustained anti-PRP concentrations from 2 to 7 months, as judged by the area under the curve, but a lower mean anti-PRP antibody concentration at 7 months.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate two- or three-dose "mixed" regimens of Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccines in the priming series. DESIGN: Two randomized clinical trials with 140 and 181 infants, respectively. SETTING: Private practices in New Orleans and Chicago. METHODS: In trial I, infants received one of four regimens. Two were recommended regimens for polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP)-meningococcal protein conjugate (M) and PRP-tetanus toxoid conjugate (T). Two mixed regimens consisted of M at 2 months followed by two doses of T or PRP-diphtheria toxoid conjugate (D) at 4 and 6 months. Trial II consisted of three groups. Two were recommended regimens for M and T. The third was a two-dose mixed regimen consisting of M at 2 months and T at 4 months. Parents were interviewed and instructed to record side effects after each vaccination. Serum was assayed for H influenzae type b anticapsular antibody (anti-PRP). RESULTS: Minor differences in safety profiles likely reflected alpha error. In trial I, M (lot 0884T, one of several known to have had decreased immunogenicity), probably primed for substantial increase in serum antibody when D or T was given at 4 and 6 months. In trial II, infants who received the two-dose mixed regimen (M from immunogenic lot 0116W at 2 months and T at 4 months) had a significantly higher mean area under the curve than recipients of the three-dose TTT regimen when antibody concentration was plotted against age, although the geometric mean anti-PRP antibody concentration for the MT-recipients was significantly lower at 7 months. CONCLUSIONS: M used in trial I may have primed infants despite poor immunogenicity. The two-dose mixed regimen (MT-) in trial II produced a mean anti-PRP antibody concentration with higher sustained anti-PRP concentrations from 2 to 7 months, as judged by the area under the curve, but a lower mean anti-PRP antibody concentration at 7 months.