Literature DB >> 8909320

Logistic regression model of fotemustine toxicity combining independent phase II studies.

E Raymond1, C Haon, C Boaziz, M Coste.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To optimize fotemustine chemotherapy, the authors considered how to combine independent Phase II trials to predict the risk of first occurrence of severe toxicity as a function of initial patient characteristics.
METHODS: Clinical data from six Phase II trials were collected. Of the 478 patients enrolled 442 (male/female, 259/183; age range, 15-81 years) were evaluable for toxicity (1384 cycles of chemotherapy), including 221 with malignant malignant melanomas, 138 with primary brain tumors, 29 with lung carcinomas, 8 with head and neck carcinomas, and 46 with miscellaneous cancers. The influence of age, sex, performance status, type of tumor, number and location of metastases, and previous treatment by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy was studied. The logistic regression method was applied to predict occurrence of leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, digestive tract, and/or hepatic toxicity.
RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that predictive factors for hematologic toxicity were age (> 50 years), type of tumor (brain < melanoma < others), number of metastatic sites (> 3), location of metastases (nonvisceral), and previous chemotherapy. Performance status and previous radiotherapy did not affect the toxicity of fotemustine Nausea and vomiting were predictable based on the type of tumor (head and neck < lung < brain < melanoma < others), the number of metastatic sites (> three) and visceral metastases. Hepatic disorders occurred preferentially in patients with hepatic metastases and more than three metastatic sites. Individual risk of hematologic and hepatic toxicity for patients with melanoma and primary brain tumors was predicted using logistic regression models.
CONCLUSIONS: By combining clinical data from independent Phase II trials, the logistic model developed could predict the probability of fotemustine hematologic and hepatic toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8909320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  5 in total

1.  Influence of geomagnetic activity on mustophoran hematotoxicity.

Authors:  M A Blank; O A Blank; M L Gershanovich
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct

2.  Can high-dose fotemustine reverse MGMT resistance in glioblastoma multiforme?

Authors:  Chiara Gallo; Carlo Buonerba; Giuseppe Di Lorenzo; Valeria Romeo; Sabino De Placido; Alfredo Marinelli
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Efficacy and safety of the third-generation chloroethylnitrosourea fotemustine for the treatment of chemorefractory T-cell lymphomas.

Authors:  Gaetano Corazzelli; Ferdinando Frigeri; Manuela Arcamone; Luigi Aloj; Gaetana Capobianco; Cristina Becchimanzi; Emanuela Morelli; Francesco Volzone; Gianpaolo Marcacci; Filippo Russo; Rosaria De Filippi; Secondo Lastoria; Antonio Pinto
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 2.997

4.  Fotemustine as second-line treatment for recurrent or progressive glioblastoma after concomitant and/or adjuvant temozolomide: a phase II trial of Gruppo Italiano Cooperativo di Neuro-Oncologia (GICNO).

Authors:  Alba A Brandes; A Tosoni; E Franceschi; V Blatt; A Santoro; M Faedi; P Amistà; M Gardiman; R Labianca; C Bianchini; M Ermani; M Reni
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Survival with dacarbazine and fotemustine in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  B Fazeny-Dörner; M Veitl; C Wenzel; K Rössler; K Ungersböck; K Dieckmann; M Piribauer; J Hainfellner; C Marosi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-02-24       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.