Literature DB >> 8909315

A comparison of proliferation markers and their prognostic value for women with endometrial carcinoma. Ki-67, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and flow cytometric S-phase fraction.

B Nordström1, P Strang, R Bergström, S Nilsson, B Tribukait.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The understanding of proliferation is a central issue in oncology. Several methods exist for the assessment of the growth fraction and cell-cycle time, but comparative studies that give the clinician advice about the most reliable use of new markers are few. The aim of the current study was to perform methodologic, descriptive, comparative, and prognostic studies of Ki-67, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and flow cytometric S-phase fraction (SPF) in endometrial carcinoma.
METHODS: The expression of Ki 67 (n = 175) and PCNA (n = 146) were studied immunohistochemically; and the SPF (n = 297) by flow cytometry. The median follow-up time was 78 months.
RESULTS: Neither Ki-67 nor PCNA had any correlation to either the stage or the histopathologic subtype of the tumors, but they were covariant with the histopathologic grade (P < 0.05). There was an interrelationship between Ki-67 and PCNA (P < 0.001), and both were associated with the size of the SPF (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.05, respectively). Mean SPF was high in advanced stages and strongly associated with histopathologic subtype (P < 0.0001) and ploidy (P < 0.0001). Tumors with strong Ki-67 expression were more often aneuploid (P < 0.01). In initial analyses, Ki-67 and SPF were predictors of poor survival (P < 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively), whereas PCNA was not. When SPF was added to a comprehensive multivariate model, Ki-67 provided no further prognostic information, whereas SPF remained a powerful predictor of survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Ki-67 and, to a lesser extent, PCNA, give approximate estimates of the growth fraction, whereas SPF only reflects the proportion of cells in S-phase. However, SPF is by far the strongest predictor of survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8909315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  8 in total

1.  Biomarkers in endometrial cancer: Possible clinical applications (Review).

Authors:  Kouji Banno; Iori Kisu; Megumi Yanokura; Kosuke Tsuji; Kenta Masuda; Arisa Ueki; Yusuke Kobayashi; Wataru Yamagami; Hiroyuki Nomura; Eiichiro Tominaga; Nobuyuki Susumu; Daisuke Aoki
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 2.  Endometrial cancer: the management of high-risk disease.

Authors:  Gunnar Kristensen; Claes Tropé
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Laminin-5 gamma2-chain expression and DNA ploidy as predictors of prognosis in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  C Lundgren; B Frankendal; C Silfverswärd; B Nilsson; K Tryggvason; G Auer; B Nordström
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Correlation of TNFAIP8 overexpression with the proliferation, metastasis, and disease-free survival in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Tianbo Liu; Hongyu Gao; Meng Yang; Tingting Zhao; Yunduo Liu; Ge Lou
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-03-04

5.  Genomic instability influences the transcriptome and proteome in endometrial cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Jens K Habermann; Nana K Bündgen; Timo Gemoll; Sampsa Hautaniemi; Caroline Lundgren; Danny Wangsa; Jana Doering; Hans-Peter Bruch; Britta Nordstroem; Uwe J Roblick; Hans Jörnvall; Gert Auer; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 27.401

6.  A case of endometrial glassy cell carcinoma: a rare entity which necessitates of better understanding.

Authors:  Clelia Callegari; Paola Algeri; Antonella Buzzi; Teresio Motta; Cinzia Manfredini; Sonia Maria Rota
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2019-10-28

7.  Biomarkers in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Eun-Kyoung Yim; Jong-Sup Park
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2007-02-07

8.  Association between RCAS1 expression and clinical outcome in uterine endometrial cancer.

Authors:  K Sonoda; S Miyamoto; T Hirakawa; T Kaku; M Nakashima; T Watanabe; K Akazawa; T Fujita; H Nakano
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-08-04       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.