Literature DB >> 8908426

Long-term cryopreservation of human donor corneas.

M Canals1, J Costa, J M Potau, M D Merindano, D Pita, D Ruano.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to develop an optimal freezing method for cryopreservation of human donor corneas for transplantation. Three groups of ten human donor corneas each were cryopreserved using cooling rates of 0.5 degree C/ min, 1 degree C/min and 9 degrees C/min. The freezing medium contained 10% fetal calf serum and 7% dimethylsulphoxide. Ten additional human donor corneas were used as controls. Endothelial cell survival after complete thawing was assessed by calculating the mean endothelial cell density and percentage of non-viable endothelial cells from vital staining and scanning electron micrographs. Significant differences in endothelial cell survival between all groups were detected by analysis of variance (p < 0.001), but paired contrast found no real differences between corneas frozen at 0.5 degree C/min or 1 degree C/min. Nevertheless, 60% of the corneas cryopreserved at 1 degree C/min but only 10% of those cryopreserved at 0.5 degree C/min fulfilled both requirements to be considered suitable for transplantation (endothelial cell density > 2000 cells/mm2 and less than 10% dead cells). None of the corneas frozen at 9 degrees C/min fulfilled these requirements. Mean endothelial cell density of corneas frozen at 1 degree C/min was 2084 cells/mm2 (range 2020 to 2630 cells/mm2). Except for isolated corneas frozen at 0.5 degree C/min, only corneas cryopreserved at a cooling rate of 1 degree C/min achieved satisfactory endothelial cell survival for their use in transplantation. However the significant interindividual variability among corneas frozen at 1 degree C/min (ANOVA: p < 0.001) prevents prediction of the condition of the cornea after the complete cryopreservation process. Until this high variability can be drastically reduced, systematic corneal cryopreservation in eye banking remains unattainable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8908426     DOI: 10.1177/112067219600600302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1120-6721            Impact factor:   1.922


  4 in total

1.  [Factors influencing corneal endothelium in organ cultures during transport].

Authors:  K Rosenbaum; T Reinhard; R Sundmacher
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  A review of long-term corneal preservation techniques: Relevance and renewed interests in the COVID-19 era.

Authors:  Sunita Chaurasia; Sujata Das; Aravind Roy
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Ultrastructural Analysis of Rehydrated Human Donor Corneas After Air-Drying and Dissection by Femtosecond Laser.

Authors:  Emilio Pedrotti; Erika Bonacci; Adriano Fasolo; Arianna De Rossi; Davide Camposampiero; Gary L A Jones; Paolo Bernardi; Flavia Merigo; Diego Ponzin; Giorgio Marchini; Andrea Sbarbati
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-21

4.  Coping with COVID-19: An Italian Perspective on Corneal Surgery and Eye Banking in the Time of a Pandemic and Beyond.

Authors:  Massimo Busin; Angeli Christy Yu; Diego Ponzin
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 12.079

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.