Literature DB >> 8908242

Numerical assessment of TOAE screening results: currently used criteria and their effect on TOAE prevalence figures.

J J Dirckx1, K Daemers, T Somers, F E Offeciers, P J Govaerts.   

Abstract

The literature on neonatal hearing screening by means of oto-acoustic emissions (OAE's) presents various prevalence figures, and gives little quantitative information on the procedure used to score the recordings. If the OAE test is to be interpreted by users who do not have the opportunity to develop intuitive interpretation skills through extensive training, a clear numerical decision criterion is needed. The present paper discusses the scoring procedure used by 25 teams, which together screen 22,356 neonates annually. More than 60% of the groups involved in this study use visual interpretation of the recorded OAE response, together with numerical criteria. Amongst the teams, 21 different ways of numerical scoring are used. It is shown that for a given set of OAE recordings, prevalence varies from 61% to 90%, depending on the numerical decision criterion being applied. We conclude that at this moment no consensus exists regarding the numerical criterion to be used when assessing OAE screening results. In view of the strong effect of criteria on the outcome of OAE screening, such consensus is urgently needed, but should be based on sensitivity and specificity figures for each scoring technique.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8908242     DOI: 10.3109/00016489609137906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  4 in total

1.  Otoacoustic emissions and improved pass/fail separation using wavelet analysis and time windowing.

Authors:  A Janusauskas; V Marozas; B Engdahl; H J Hoffman; O Svensson; L Sörnmo
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Ravi Kapoor; Naresh K Panda
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  [Universal newborn hearing screening. Methodical aspects].

Authors:  S Hoth; K Neumann; H Weissschuh; J Bräunert; P Böttcher; C Hornberger; H Maul; B Beedgen; K Buschmann; C Sohn; G Hoffmann; P Plinkert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Occupational styrene exposure and hearing loss: a cohort study with repeated measurements.

Authors:  Gerhard Triebig; Thomas Bruckner; Andreas Seeber
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 3.015

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.