Literature DB >> 8907122

Anchorage-dependent control of muscle-specific gene expression in C2C12 mouse myoblasts.

D J Milasincic1, J Dhawan, S R Farmer.   

Abstract

Our previous studies have demonstrated that expression of growth-associated genes is regulated by the adhesive state of the cell. To understand the role of cell adhesion in regulating the switch from growth to differentiation, we are studying the differentiation of mouse myoblasts into multinucleated contractile myotubes. In this report, we describe a novel means of culturing C2C12 myoblasts that permits an analysis of the role of cell adhesion in regulating the sequential induction of muscle-specific genes that control myogenesis. Suspension of an asynchronous, proliferating population of myoblasts in a viscous gel of methylcellulose dissolved in medium containing 20% serum induces growth arrest in G0 phase of the cell cycle without a concomitant induction of muscle-specific genes. Reattachment to a solid substratum in 20% serum, 0.5 nM bFGF, or 10 nM IGF-1 rapidly activates entry of the quiescent cells into G1 followed by a synchronous progression of the cell population through into S phase. bFGF or IGF-1 added separately facilitate only one passage through the cell cycle, whereas 20% serum or the two growth factors added together support multiple cell divisions. Adhesion of suspended cells in DMEM alone or with 3 nM IGF-1 induces myogenesis as evidenced by the synthesis of myogenin and myosin heavy chain (MHC) proteins followed by fusion into myotubes. bFGF completely inhibits this differentiation process even in the presence of myogenic doses of IGF-1. Addition of 3 nM IGF-1 to quiescent myoblasts maintained in suspension culture in serum-free conditions does not induce myogenin or MHC expression. Thus, adhesion is a requirement for the induction of muscle gene expression in mouse myoblasts. The development of a muscle cell culture environment in which proliferating myoblasts can be growth arrested in G0 without activating muscle-specific gene expression provides a means of analyzing the synchronous activation of either the myogenic or growth programs and how adhesion affects each process, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8907122     DOI: 10.1007/bf02723040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim        ISSN: 1071-2690            Impact factor:   2.416


  40 in total

Review 1.  Towards understanding skeletal muscle regeneration.

Authors:  M D Grounds
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  The retinoblastoma gene product regulates progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle.

Authors:  D W Goodrich; N P Wang; Y W Qian; E Y Lee; W H Lee
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-10-18       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  MyoD and the regulation of myogenesis by helix-loop-helix proteins.

Authors:  S J Tapscott; H Weintraub
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Plasticity of the differentiated state.

Authors:  H M Blau; G K Pavlath; E C Hardeman; C P Chiu; L Silberstein; S G Webster; S C Miller; C Webster
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-11-15       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Regulation of alpha 1 (I)-collagen gene expression in response to cell adhesion in Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts.

Authors:  J Dhawan; S R Farmer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1990-06-05       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Dedifferentiated chondrocytes reexpress the differentiated collagen phenotype when cultured in agarose gels.

Authors:  P D Benya; J D Shaffer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Analysis of the myogenin promoter reveals an indirect pathway for positive autoregulation mediated by the muscle-specific enhancer factor MEF-2.

Authors:  D G Edmondson; T C Cheng; P Cserjesi; T Chakraborty; E N Olson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Interaction of myogenic factors and the retinoblastoma protein mediates muscle cell commitment and differentiation.

Authors:  W Gu; J W Schneider; G Condorelli; S Kaushal; V Mahdavi; B Nadal-Ginard
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-02-12       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Growth factor control of skeletal muscle differentiation: commitment to terminal differentiation occurs in G1 phase and is repressed by fibroblast growth factor.

Authors:  C H Clegg; T A Linkhart; B B Olwin; S D Hauschka
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  G1/S control of anchorage-independent growth in the fibroblast cell cycle.

Authors:  T M Guadagno; R K Assoian
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of cellular chromatin state: insights from quiescence and differentiation.

Authors:  Surabhi Srivastava; Rakesh K Mishra; Jyotsna Dhawan
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Photolithographic patterning of C2C12 myotubes using vitronectin as growth substrate in serum-free medium.

Authors:  Peter Molnar; Weishi Wang; Anupama Natarajan; John W Rumsey; James J Hickman
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb

3.  The effects of three-dimensional cell culture on single myoblasts.

Authors:  Michele L Marquette; Diane Byerly; Marguerite Sognier
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 2.416

4.  A gene-trap strategy identifies quiescence-induced genes in synchronized myoblasts.

Authors:  Ramkumar Sambasivan; Grace K Pavlath; Jyotsna Dhawan
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 5.  Stem Cell Quiescence: Dynamism, Restraint, and Cellular Idling.

Authors:  Cindy T J van Velthoven; Thomas A Rando
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 24.633

6.  In vitro induction of quiescence in isolated primary human myoblasts.

Authors:  Kirankumar B Gudagudi; Niccolò Passerin d'Entrèves; Nicholas J Woudberg; Paul J Steyn; Kathryn H Myburgh
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.058

7.  Stimulation of C2C12 myoblast growth by basic fibroblast growth factor and insulin-like growth factor 1 can occur via mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent and -independent pathways.

Authors:  D J Milasincic; M R Calera; S R Farmer; P F Pilch
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Global regulation of alternative splicing during myogenic differentiation.

Authors:  Christopher S Bland; Eric T Wang; Anthony Vu; Marjorie P David; John C Castle; Jason M Johnson; Christopher B Burge; Thomas A Cooper
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  MLL5, a trithorax homolog, indirectly regulates H3K4 methylation, represses cyclin A2 expression, and promotes myogenic differentiation.

Authors:  Soji Sebastian; Prethish Sreenivas; Ramkumar Sambasivan; Sirisha Cheedipudi; Prashanth Kandalla; Grace K Pavlath; Jyotsna Dhawan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Decoding the stem cell quiescence cycle--lessons from yeast for regenerative biology.

Authors:  Jyotsna Dhawan; Sunil Laxman
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 5.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.