Literature DB >> 8906131

Early and long-term wear of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers.

A J de Gee1, R N van Duinen, A Werner, C L Davidson.   

Abstract

Various studies have shown that glass ionomers are susceptible to brittle fracture and acid conditions and that they undergo long-term changes in their mechanical properties. Little information is available on how brittleness, acid susceptibility, and long-term changes are reflected in the wear characteristics of glass ionomers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term changes in conventional glass ionomers, metal-reinforced glass ionomers (including a cermet), and (light-curing) resinmodified glass ionomers by wear experiments simulating the wear process in occlusal contact-free areas. The wear tests were conducted periodically over a period of one year. In addition, wear was determined after one year at a pH of 5 or 6, for assessment of acid susceptibility, and at a condition as found in the occlusal contact areas. All materials showed high early-wear rates which decreased significantly during the one-year test period. This long-term process may be related to a slow progression of the acid-base reaction extending over several months. At each stage, the resinmodified glass ionomers wore significantly faster than the acid-base setting glass ionomers. Most of these materials were not affected at a pH of 6.0, while at a pH of 5.0 only the conventional and the metal-reinforced glass ionomers showed increased wear. Direct contacts with the antagonist led to a significant increase in wear in comparison with contact-free wear, probably as a result of sub-surface fatigue phenomena. In view of the unfavorable wear characteristics of the resin-modified glass ionomers and the high early wear of the conventional glass ionomers, including the metal-reinforced glass ionomers, it was concluded that none of these materials can yet be recommended for use in high-stress-bearing situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8906131     DOI: 10.1177/00220345960750081401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  19 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of the remineralising effects and surface microhardness of glass ionomer cement containing grape seed extract and casein phosphopeptide - amorphous calcium phosphate: an in vitro study.

Authors:  A R Prabhakar; D Sharma; S Sugandhan
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2012-06

Review 2.  Restoration of class II cavities in primary molar teeth with conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  B L Chadwick; D J P Evans
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2007-03

3.  Effect of ultrasound on the setting characteristics of glass ionomer cements studied by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  A Talal; K E Tanner; R Billington; G J Pearson
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Bioactive sol-gel glass added ionomer cement for the regeneration of tooth structure.

Authors:  Jung-Young Choi; Hae-Hyoung Lee; Hae-Won Kim
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Dental materials for primary dentition: are they suitable for occlusal restorations? A two-body wear study.

Authors:  D Lazaridou; R Belli; N Krämer; A Petschelt; U Lohbauer
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2014-10-25

6.  Nanocomposite containing CaF(2) nanoparticles: thermal cycling, wear and long-term water-aging.

Authors:  Michael D Weir; Jennifer L Moreau; Eric D Levine; Howard E Strassler; Laurence C Chow; Hockin H K Xu
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 5.304

7.  Two-year clinical performance of glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in xerostomic head- and neck-irradiated cancer patients.

Authors:  Roeland J G De Moor; Inge G Stassen; Yoke van 't Veldt; Dries Torbeyns; Geert M G Hommez
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Comparison of resin modified glass ionomer cement and composite resin in class II primary molar restorations: a 2-year parallel randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  A Dermata; S N Papageorgiou; S Fragkou; N Kotsanos
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2018-10-15

9.  Effect of a calcium chloride solution treatment on physical and mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements.

Authors:  Dimitrios Dionysopoulos; Kosmas Tolidis; Dimitrios Tortopidis; Paris Gerasimou; Thrasyvoulos Sfeikos
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.634

10.  The role of glass composition in the behaviour of glass acetic acid and glass lactic acid cements.

Authors:  Saroash Shahid; R W Billington; G J Pearson
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.