Literature DB >> 8905354

When to discharge patients with bleeding peptic ulcers: a prospective study of residual risk of rebleeding.

P I Hsu1, K H Lai, X Z Lin, Y F Yang, M Lin, J S Shin, G H Lo, R L Huang, C F Chang, C K Lin, L P Ger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: From January 1993 to December 1994, we conducted a prospective study to investigate the evolutionary change of rebleeding risk in bleeding peptic ulcers. To obviate possible confounding factors that would influence decision making for discharge of patients, subjects with coexistent acute illnesses, systemic bleeding disorders, alcoholism, and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were excluded.
METHODS: Emergency endoscopies were performed in patients with hematemesis or a melena within 24 hours of admission. Ulcer lesions were divided into six categories according to endoscopic findings. The residual risks of rebleeding of each type of ulcers were calculated for 10 days, and the critical point of acceptable rebleeding risk after discharge was set at 3%.
RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-two patients with bleeding peptic ulcers completed the study. The ulcers, characterized by clean bases, red or black spots, adherent clots, nonbleeding visible vessels without local therapy, nonbleeding visible vessels with local therapy, and bleeding visible vessels with local therapy took 0, 3, 3, 4, 4, and 3 days, respectively, to decrease rebleeding risk to below the critical point. All episodes of fatal rebleeding (n = 4) occurred within 24 hours after admission.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with clean-based ulcers can be discharged in the first day of admission. The optimal duration required for hospitalization of patients with ulcers characterized by nonbleeding visible vessels at initial endoscopy is 4 days. The remaining patients with ulcers marked by other bleeding stigmata may be discharged after a 3-day observation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8905354     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70085-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  6 in total

Review 1.  Timing of rebleeding in high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding after successful hemostasis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sara El Ouali; Alan Barkun; Myriam Martel; Davide Maggio
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-11

2.  Endoscopic hemoclip treatment for bleeding peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Yung-Chih Lai; Sien-Sing Yang; Chi-Hwa Wu; Tzen-Kwan Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Intravenous pantoprazole versus ranitidine for prevention of rebleeding after endoscopic hemostasis of bleeding peptic ulcers.

Authors:  Ping-I Hsu; Gin-Ho Lo; Ching-Chu Lo; Chiun-Ku Lin; Hoi-Hung Chan; Chung-Jen Wu; Chang-Bih Shie; Pei-Min Tsai; Deng-Chyang Wu; Wen-Ming Wang; Kwok-Hung Lai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding: how urgent is it?

Authors:  Kelvin K F Tsoi; Terry K W Ma; Joseph J Y Sung
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 5.  Upper endoscopy in patients with acute myocardial infarction and upper gastrointestinal bleeding: results of a decision analysis.

Authors:  Patrick Yachimski; Chin Hur
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Consensus on control of risky nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Taiwan with National Health Insurance.

Authors:  Bor-Shyang Sheu; Chun-Ying Wu; Ming-Shiang Wu; Cheng-Tang Chiu; Chun-Che Lin; Ping-I Hsu; Hsiu-Chi Cheng; Teng-Yu Lee; Hsiu-Po Wang; Jaw-Town Lin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.