Literature DB >> 8905288

Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations.

L H Edmunds1, R E Clark, L H Cohn, G L Grunkemeier, D C Miller, R D Weisel.   

Abstract

At the request of the Councils of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and the American Association of Thoracic Surgery (AATS) the Ad Hoc Liaison Committee for Standardizing Definitions of Prosthetic Heart Valve Morbidity reviewed the "Guidelines" published in September 1988 [3, 7, 8]. The purpose of the review was to update and clarify definitions within the guidelines and to consider recommendations made by other [2, 11]. The variety of cardiac valvular procedures has expanded since 1988; therefore, in this document the term "operated valve" indicates prosthetic and bioprosthetic heart valves of all types, operated or repaired native valves and allograft and autograft valves. The term "operated valve" includes any cardiac valve altered by a surgeon during an operation. Much morbidity and mortality is a direct consequence of the interaction between the patient and operated valve(s), although patient variables (e.g., age, degree of coronary arterial disease, follow-up care, etc.) may be more responsible for outcomes than an operated valve. However, no set of guidelines can identify all possible patient factors that may affect morbidity and mortality. General agreement regarding the following definitions of terms and suggestions for reporting data do not preclude more detailed analyses or constructive recommendations and investigators are encouraged to identify relevant patient factors in addition to factors related to operated valves. Purpose The purpose of these guidelines is to facilitate the analysis and reporting of results of operations on diseased cardiac valves. The definitions and recommendations that follow are guidelines, not standards, and are designed to facilitate comparisons between the experiences of different surgeons who treat different cohorts of patients at different times with different techniques and materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8905288     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(96)80347-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  4 in total

1.  Risk factors for short- and long-term survival in patients undergoing re-replacement due to prosthetic valve dysfunction.

Authors:  Bilgehan Savaş Oz; Hikmet Iyem; Hakki Tankut Akay; Cengiz Bolcal; Mehmet Yokusoglu; Erkan Kuralay; Ufuk Demirkilic; Harun Tatar
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Optimal timing of aortic valve replacement in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Akira Marumoto; Yoshinobu Nakamura; Yuichiro Kishimoto; Munehiro Saiki; Motonobu Nishimura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Altmetric Versus Bibliometric Perspective Regarding Publication Impact and Force.

Authors:  Arfon G M T Powell; Victoria Bevan; Chris Brown; Wyn G Lewis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  A novel approach of tricuspid valve repair: mitralization of tricuspid valve.

Authors:  Cengiz Köksal; Emre Selçuk; Gökhan Kahveci; Hasan Erdem
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-06-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.