Literature DB >> 8904749

Tactile rod bisection: hemispheric activation and sex differences.

B Laeng1, H A Buchtel, C M Butter.   

Abstract

Blindfolded subjects estimated with either hand the center of rods positioned in either left or right hemispace. In one condition, they also performed a concurrent verbal task. Bias and variability of bisection settings were the dependent variables. Bisections performed in left hemispace were biased to the left of true center, more so when the left hand was used. In contrast, bisections performed in right hemispace were biased rightward, more so when the right hand was used. There were no significant differences in variability of bisections in any condition. Interactions of hand with hemispace in which the task was performed differed for the two sexes. Moreover, the secondary verbal task had no effect on either measure. We conclude that of several factors that may underlie bisection biases, attention was the most relevant.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8904749     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(96)00025-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  4 in total

1.  Memory for locations within regions: spatial biases and visual hemifield differences.

Authors:  B Laeng; M Peters; B McCabe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-01

Review 2.  Representational pseudoneglect: a review.

Authors:  Joanna L Brooks; Sergio Della Sala; Stephen Darling
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  The effect of musical expertise on the representation of space.

Authors:  Carlotta Lega; Zaira Cattaneo; Lotfi B Merabet; Tomaso Vecchi; Silvia Cucchi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Different effects of numerical magnitude on visual and proprioceptive reference frames.

Authors:  Elvio Blini; Zaira Cattaneo; Giuseppe Vallar
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-04-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.