Literature DB >> 8902971

Surgical treatment of patients with back problems covered by workers compensation versus those with other sources of payment.

V M Taylor1, R A Deyo, M Ciol, W Kreuter.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: The present study examines relationships between workers compensation coverage and the surgical treatment of patients with low back problems.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the mix of surgical procedures, reoperation rates, and resource use among patients receiving workers compensation and these with other sources of payment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is evidence that patients with low back pain who receive workers' compensation have poorer clinical outcomes than other patients with back problems.
METHODS: The authors used data from Washington State's automated hospital discharge system for 1988 through 1991. The study group included 1502 patients receiving workers compensation and 2674 patients not receiving workers compensation.
RESULTS: If the patients were covered by workers' compensation, they were 1.37 times more likely to undergo surgery involving fusion (95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.80) and almost twice as likely to have a subsequent reoperation within 3 years of the index surgery (odds ratio, 1.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-2.15.
CONCLUSIONS: In Washington state, patients receiving workers' compensation have higher rates of low back fusion surgery and reoperations than other patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8902971     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199610010-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of early versus delayed functional restoration for chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Brian R Theodore; Tom G Mayer; Robert J Gatchel
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-06

2.  Primary total knee arthroplasty in patients receiving workers' compensation benefits.

Authors:  Justin de Beer; Danielle Petruccelli; Rajiv Gandhi; Mitchell Winemaker
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Impact of Body Mass Index on Postsurgical Outcomes for Workers' Compensation Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Madhav R Patel; Kevin C Jacob; Frank A Chavez; Justin T DesLaurier; Hanna Pawlowski; Michael C Prabhu; Nisheka N Vanjani; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-06-20

4.  What is different about workers' compensation patients? Socioeconomic predictors of baseline disability status among patients with lumbar radiculopathy.

Authors:  Steven J Atlas; Tor D Tosteson; Brett Hanscom; Emily A Blood; Glenn S Pransky; William A Abdu; Gunnar B Andersson; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  ANALYSIS OF RISK FACTORS FOR SUCCESS OF LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS SURGERY.

Authors:  Caroline Oliveira Brêtas; Larissa Furbino de Pinho Valentim; Nelson Elias; Igor Machado Cardoso; Joelmar César de Almeida; Charbel Jacob
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.513

Review 6.  Does Workers' Compensation Status Affect Outcomes after Lumbar Spine Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Fabrizio Russo; Sergio De Salvatore; Luca Ambrosio; Gianluca Vadalà; Luca Fontana; Rocco Papalia; Jorma Rantanen; Sergio Iavicoli; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  The cascade of medical services and associated longitudinal costs due to nonadherent magnetic resonance imaging for low back pain.

Authors:  Barbara S Webster; YoonSun Choi; Ann Z Bauer; Manuel Cifuentes; Glenn Pransky
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.