Literature DB >> 8902031

Gender differences during processing of the Stroop task.

J E Mekarski1, T R Cutmore, W Suboski.   

Abstract

An assertion was made that "There are no sex differences in Stroop interference" (MacLeod, 1991, p. 203) in spite of some evidence to the contrary (e.g., Sarmany, 1977). To resolve the discrepancy, this study examined the nature of gender differences in the context of other variables. 6 men and 8 women were tested, using response speed and errors made as dependent measures. Independent variables were gender, perceptual input (Stroop) task, congruency of stimuli, manual response output, and trial block. Contrary to MacLeod, men were consistently slower than women over trial blocks by some 46 msec., although their error rates did not differ significantly. Response output interacted with gender, with Stroop task, and with trial block. Congruent stimuli were processed faster than incongruent ones. Differences may be ascribed to greater verbal and fine motor abilities of women and greater spatial ability of men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8902031     DOI: 10.2466/pms.1996.83.2.563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Mot Skills        ISSN: 0031-5125


  10 in total

1.  Gender differences in the functional neuroanatomy of emotional episodic autobiographical memory.

Authors:  Martina Piefke; Peter H Weiss; Hans J Markowitsch; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Women are more sensitive than men to prior trial events on the Stop-signal task.

Authors:  Katharine N Thakkar; Eliza Congdon; Russell A Poldrack; Fred W Sabb; Edythe D London; Tyrone D Cannon; Robert M Bilder
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2013-05-15

3.  The relationship between computer experience and computerized cognitive test performance among older adults.

Authors:  Pariya L Fazeli; Lesley A Ross; David E Vance; Karlene Ball
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Functional brain network changes associated with maintenance of cognitive function in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Santosh A Helekar; Jae C Shin; Brandi J Mattson; Krystle Bartley; Milena Stosic; Toni Saldana-King; P Read Montague; George J Hutton
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Sex-specific neural activity when resolving cognitive interference in individuals with or without prior internalizing disorders.

Authors:  Zhishun Wang; Rachel H Jacobs; Rachel Marsh; Guillermo Horga; Jianping Qiao; Virginia Warner; Myrna M Weissman; Bradley S Peterson
Journal:  Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 2.376

6.  Exercise Similarly Facilitates Men and Women's Selective Attention Task Response Times but Differentially Affects Memory Task Performance.

Authors:  Matt Coleman; Kelsey Offen; Julie Markant
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-13

7.  Sex and menstrual cycle influences on three aspects of attention.

Authors:  Belinda Pletzer; Ti-Anni Harris; Tuulia Ortner
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-07-08

8.  Switching between forest and trees: opposite relationship of progesterone and testosterone to global-local processing.

Authors:  Belinda Pletzer; Ourania Petasis; Larry Cahill
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.587

9.  Emotional development among early school-age children: gender differences in the role of problem behaviours.

Authors:  Lisa K Maguire; Ulrike Niens; Mark McCann; Paul Connolly
Journal:  Educ Psychol (Lond)       Date:  2015-04-23

10.  Sex Differences Linking Pain-Related Fear and Interoceptive Hypervigilance: Attentional Biases to Conditioned Threat and Safety Signals in a Visceral Pain Model.

Authors:  Franziska Labrenz; Sopiko Knuf-Rtveliashvili; Sigrid Elsenbruch
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 4.157

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.