Literature DB >> 8901852

Randomized trial of two versus five years of adjuvant tamoxifen for postmenopausal early stage breast cancer. Swedish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postsurgical treatment with tamoxifen has been shown to improve overall survival among patients with early stage breast cancer. However, the optimal duration of tamoxifen treatment remains controversial.
PURPOSE: A multicenter, randomized trial was initiated in Sweden in the early 1980s to compare 2 years with 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen in the treatment of postmenopausal women younger than 75 years of age who had early stage, axillary lymph node-negative or -positive, invasive disease.
METHODS: The trial was planned and organized by the Swedish Breast Cancer Group, and it involved five regional breast cancer study organizations (South Sweden, South-East Sweden, Stockholm, Uppsala-Orebro, and North Sweden). During the period from 1983 through 1991, a total of 3887 patients were entered in the trial; 3545 (91%) women remained alive and recurrence free at 2 years and could thus contribute meaningful information to the 2-year (n = 1801) versus 5-year (n = 1744) comparison. Primary surgery consisted of either modified radical mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery. Radiation therapy was indicated for patients with lymph node-positive disease and was generally offered to all women who were treated with breast-conserving surgery. Only 89 (2.5%) of the 3545 women who were recurrence free at 2 years received adjuvant chemotherapy concurrently with tamoxifen. Twenty-milligram daily doses of tamoxifen were used at two centers, and 40-mg daily doses were used at the remaining three centers. Estrogen receptor status of the tumor was known for 2987 women (77% of the entered patients). Primary end points in the trial were event-free survival (local-regional recurrence, distant metastasis, contralateral breast cancer, or death) and overall survival. Survival curves were estimated by use of the life-table method. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to make comparisons between the 2- and 5-year treatment groups.
RESULTS: Patients assigned to receive 5 years of tamoxifen, compared with 2 years of tamoxifen, experienced statistically significant improvements in event-free survival (relative hazard = 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.71-0.96) and overall survival (relative hazard = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.69-0.99). These findings translate into an 18% relative reduction in both first events (95% CI = 4%-29%) and mortality (95% CI = 1%-31%) with the longer treatment. Overall survival at 10 years was estimated to be 80% among patients in the 5-year tamoxifen group who were alive and recurrence free at 2 years, compared with 74% among corresponding patients in the 2-year treatment group. The benefit associated with the longer treatment extended to women with lymph node-positive as well as lymph node-negative disease, but it appeared to be restricted to women whose tumors were classified as estrogen receptor positive.
CONCLUSION: Five years of adjuvant tamoxifen is more beneficial than 2 years in the treatment of postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive, early stage, invasive breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8901852     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/88.21.1543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  46 in total

Review 1.  Contribution of randomised controlled trials to understanding and management of early breast cancer.

Authors:  M Baum; J Houghton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-28

Review 2.  Hormonal therapy for primary breast cancer: scientific rationale and status of clinical research.

Authors:  Lisa E Sokolowicz; William J Gradishar
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Tamoxifen and CYP2D6: a contradiction of data.

Authors:  Daniel L Hertz; Howard L McLeod; William J Irvin
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-04-24

Review 4.  Adjuvant tamoxifen: how long before we know how long?

Authors:  D Rea; C Poole; R Gray
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-05-16

5.  The change from brand-name to generic aromatase inhibitors and hormone therapy adherence for early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Dawn L Hershman; Jennifer Tsui; Jay Meyer; Sherry Glied; Grace Clarke Hillyer; Jason D Wright; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Pathology parameters and adjuvant tamoxifen response in a randomised premenopausal breast cancer trial.

Authors:  K Jirström; L Rydén; L Anagnostaki; B Nordenskjöld; O Stål; S Thorstenson; G Chebil; P-E Jönsson; M Fernö; G Landberg
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Extended Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Dara B Bracken-Clarke; Mairi W Lucas; Michaela J Higgins
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Concurrent use of aromatase inhibitors and hypofractionated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Cyrus Chargari; Pablo Castro-Pena; Ivan Toledano; Marc A Bollet; Alexia Savignoni; Paul Cottu; Fatima Laki; François Campana; Patricia De Cremoux; Alain Fourquet; Youlia M Kirova
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-28

Review 9.  Update on the use of aromatase inhibitors in early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Georgios Kesisis; Andreas Makris; David Miles
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Cohort study examining tamoxifen adherence and its relationship to mortality in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  C McCowan; J Shearer; P T Donnan; J A Dewar; M Crilly; A M Thompson; T P Fahey
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.