Literature DB >> 8901726

Influence of sex on the use of cardiac procedures in patients presenting to the emergency department. A prospective multicenter study.

C Maynard1, J R Beshansky, J L Griffith, H P Selker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reports about the use of cardiac procedures have produced conflicting results as to whether there is a sex bias in the use of thrombolytic therapy, cardiac catheterization, or revascularization procedures. The present study was undertaken with the hope of resolving some of these different findings by examining the use of these therapies in women and men who presented to the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia. METHODS AND
RESULTS: During 7 consecutive months in 1993, 10673 individuals > or = 30 years old who presented with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia were enrolled in the Acute Cardiac Ischemia Time-Insensitive Predictive Instrument Clinical Trial at 10 hospitals in the East and Midwest. This study included 2542 patients (24% of all patients) who had confirmed acute myocardial infarction or angina pectoris. There were significant sex differences with respect to demographic and clinical characteristics and the use of cardiac procedures. Among patients with acute myocardial infarction, the use of thrombolytic therapy, cardiac catheterization, and revascularization procedures was similar in women and men after multivariate adjustment. However, in the group with angina pectoris, women were considerably less likely to undergo these procedures, even after adjustment for significant baseline covariates.
CONCLUSIONS: Women with angina pectoris were less likely to undergo cardiac catheterization or revascularization procedures, although unmeasured factors could in part explain the observed differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8901726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  7 in total

1.  Do race and gender influence the use of invasive procedures?

Authors:  R E Watson; A D Stein; F C Dwamena; J Kroll; R Mitra; B A McIntosh; P Vasilenko; M M Holmes-Rovner; Q Chen; J Kupersmith
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Sex differences in the diagnostic evaluation of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Patricia K Nguyen; Divya Nag; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Gender differences and the trend in the acute myocardial infarction: a 10-year nationwide population-based analysis.

Authors:  Hung-Yu Yang; Jen-Hung Huang; Chien-Yeh Hsu; Yi-Jen Chen
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-09-10

4.  Spatial variation in the management and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Alain Vanasse; Théophile Niyonsenga; Josiane Courteau; Jean-Pierre Grégoire; Abbas Hemiari; Julie Loslier; Goze Bénié
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 5.  Coronary artery disease in women: a review on prevention, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Leila Fernandes Araujo; Alexandre de Matos Soeiro; Juliano Lara Fernandes; Antônio Eduardo Pesaro; Carlos V Serrano
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2006

6.  Breast Arterial Calcification: a New Marker of Cardiovascular Risk?

Authors:  Carlos Iribarren; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep       Date:  2013-02-03

7.  Gender differences in the clinical management of patients with angina pectoris: a cross-sectional survey in primary care.

Authors:  Mike Crilly; Peter Bundred; Xiyuan Hu; Lisa Leckey; Fiona Johnstone
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.