Literature DB >> 8900285

A nucleotide-flipping mechanism from the structure of human uracil-DNA glycosylase bound to DNA.

G Slupphaug1, C D Mol, B Kavli, A S Arvai, H E Krokan, J A Tainer.   

Abstract

Any uracil bases in DNA, a result of either misincorporation or deamination of cytosine, are removed by uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG), one of the most efficient and specific of the base-excision DNA-repair enzymes. Crystal structures of human and viral UDGs complexed with free uracil have indicated that the enzyme binds an extrahelical uracil. Such binding of undamaged extrahelical bases has been seen in the structures of two bacterial methyltransferases and bacteriophage T4 endonuclease V. Here we characterize the DNA binding and kinetics of several engineered human UDG mutants and present the crystal structure of one of these, which to our knowledge represents the first structure of any eukaryotic DNA repair enzyme in complex with its damaged, target DNA. Electrostatic orientation along the UDG active site, insertion of an amino acid (residue 272) into the DNA through the minor groove, and compression of the DNA backbone flanking the uracil all result in the flipping-out of the damaged base from the DNA major groove, allowing specific recognition of its phosphate, deoxyribose and uracil moieties. Our structure thus provides a view of a productive complex specific for cleavage of uracil from DNA and also reveals the basis for the enzyme-assisted nucleotide flipping by this critical DNA-repair enzyme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8900285     DOI: 10.1038/384087a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  177 in total

1.  Clue to damage recognition by UvrB: residues in the beta-hairpin structure prevent binding to non-damaged DNA.

Authors:  G F Moolenaar; L Höglund; N Goosen
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Investigation of a conserved stacking interaction in target site recognition by the U1A protein.

Authors:  Jerome C Shiels; Jacob B Tuite; Scott J Nolan; Anne M Baranger
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Two amino acid replacements change the substrate preference of DNA mismatch glycosylase Mig.MthI from T/G to A/G.

Authors:  Yvonne N Fondufe-Mittendorf; Christine Härer; Wilfried Kramer; Hans-Joachim Fritz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  AdoMet-dependent methylation, DNA methyltransferases and base flipping.

Authors:  X Cheng; R J Roberts
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  A novel type of uracil-DNA glycosylase mediating repair of hydrolytic DNA damage in the extremely thermophilic eubacterium Thermus thermophilus.

Authors:  Vytaute Starkuviene; Hans-Joachim Fritz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 6.  Plant DNA methyltransferases.

Authors:  E J Finnegan; K A Kovac
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 7.  DNA glycosylases in the base excision repair of DNA.

Authors:  H E Krokan; R Standal; G Slupphaug
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  Nucleosome disruption by DNA ligase III-XRCC1 promotes efficient base excision repair.

Authors:  Ian D Odell; Joy-El Barbour; Drew L Murphy; Julie A Della-Maria; Joann B Sweasy; Alan E Tomkinson; Susan S Wallace; David S Pederson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Substitutions at tyrosine 66 of Escherichia coli uracil DNA glycosylase lead to characterization of an efficient enzyme that is recalcitrant to product inhibition.

Authors:  Narottam Acharya; Ramappa K Talawar; K Saikrishnan; M Vijayan; Umesh Varshney
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Protein-facilitated base flipping in DNA by cytosine-5-methyltransferase.

Authors:  Niu Huang; Nilesh K Banavali; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.