Literature DB >> 8899831

Design of biological equivalence programs for therapeutic biotechnology products in clinical development: a perspective.

J Mordenti1, J A Cavagnaro, J D Green.   

Abstract

The determination of biological equivalence requires that studies are conducted to establish that two molecules, two formulations, of two dosing regimens, for example, are indistinguishable with respect to safety and efficacy profiles that have been previously established. The criteria that are used to establish biological equivalence will depend on the nature of the change (e.g., molecular, process, formulation), the stage of the development program, the duration of treatment, and the intended clinical indications. Key components of an equivalence program include chemical characterization, in vitro and in vivo bioactivity against reference material, pharmacokinetics, and safety. Special considerations for patient populations, endogenous concentrations, environmental factors, immunogenicity, assay methodology, biochemical identity, pharmacodynamic equivalence, and statistical methodology are discussed. In addition, the role of preclinical in vivo assessments is addressed. Specific case studies provide insight into the varied nature of approaches that are currently employed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8899831     DOI: 10.1023/a:1016002823485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  4 in total

1.  A comparison of the bioequivalence of two formulations of epoetin alfa after subcutaneous injection.

Authors:  Akashi Togawa; Takanori Tanaka; Satoru Nagashima; Hiroyuki Keta; Yasue Kobayashi; Yasuhiro Nishikawa; Masanobu Yanai; Hideji Tanaka
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Approaches to handling pharmacodynamic baseline responses.

Authors:  Chantaratsamon Dansirikul; Hanna E Silber; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  A novel approach to evaluate the pharmacokinetic biocomparability of a monoclonal antibody derived from two different cell lines using simultaneous crossover design.

Authors:  Chao Han; Thomas S McIntosh; Brian J Geist; Trina Jiao; Thomas A Puchalski; Kenneth M Goldberg; Tong-Yuan Yang; Charles E Pendley; Honghui Zhou; Hugh M Davis
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Approaches to handling missing or "problematic" pharmacology data: Pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Donald J Irby; Mustafa E Ibrahim; Anees M Dauki; Mohamed A Badawi; Sílvia M Illamola; Mingqing Chen; Yuhuan Wang; Xiaoxi Liu; Mitch A Phelps; Diane R Mould
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.