Literature DB >> 8898599

Determining the size of a total purchasing site to manage the financial risks of rare costly referrals: computer simulation model.

M O Bachmann1, G Bevan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the financial risks of 15 categories of rare costly referrals for total purchasing sites of different population sizes.
DESIGN: Computer simulation of 100 fund years assuming Poisson distribution of referrals.
SETTING: British general practices that have opted to become total purchasing sites. Referral rates and price estimates were supplied by South and West Devon Health Commission. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Variation in referral costs to purchasers in relation to size of risk pool (person years at risk).
RESULTS: Random variation in referral costs increased as the size of the risk pool decreased. Variation increased greatly below 30,000 person years. The mean simulated cost of the referral categories considered was 2.8% of total NHS hospital and community service costs, and the maximum simulated cost for 7000 person years was 6.8%. Simulated variation was robust to assumption about prices and referral rates for specific types of referral.
CONCLUSION: Rare costly referrals seem unlikely to bankrupt total purchasing sites. The management of risk is not in itself justification for total purchasing to be based in several general practices in order to generate large populations. There are other ways of managing risk. Sites can easily explore options by simulations using local referral rates and prices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8898599      PMCID: PMC2352382          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.313.7064.1054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  7 in total

1.  Fundholding in general practice and financial risk.

Authors:  B J Crump; J E Cubbon; M F Drummond; R A Hawkes; M D Marchment
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-06-29

2.  What do we known about fundholding in general practice?

Authors:  J Dixon; H Glennerster
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-16

3.  Adverse selection: the Achilles heel of the NHS reforms.

Authors:  R Scheffler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-04-29       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Ways of measuring rates of recurrent events.

Authors:  R J Glynn; J E Buring
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-02-10

5.  Can there be fair funding for fundholding practices?

Authors:  J Dixon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-03-19

Review 6.  General practitioner fundholding: weighing the evidence.

Authors:  R Petchey
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-10-28       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Distribution of NHS funds between fundholding and non-fundholding practices.

Authors:  J Dixon; M Dinwoodie; D Hodson; S Dodd; T Poltorak; C Garrett; P Rice; I Doncaster; M Williams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-07-02
  7 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Is bigger better for primary care groups and trusts?

Authors:  C Bojke; H Gravelle; D Wilkin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-10

2.  Evaluating primary care groups.

Authors:  S Gillam; A Coulter
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Setting budgets for general practice in the new NHS.

Authors:  P C Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-20

4.  Comparing the financial risk of bed-day and DRG based pricing types using parametric and simulation methods.

Authors:  Hennamari Mikkola; Reijo Sund; Miika Linna; Unto Häkkinen
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2003-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.