Literature DB >> 8898235

Rhombencephalic neural crest segmentation is preserved throughout craniofacial ontogeny.

G Köntges1, A Lumsden.   

Abstract

To investigate the influence of hindbrain segmentation on craniofacial patterning we have studied the long term fate of neural crest (NC) subpopulations of individual rhombomeres (r), using quail-chick chimeras. Mapping of all skeletal and muscle connective tissues developing from these small regions revealed several novel features of the cranial neural crest. First, the mandibular arch skeleton has a composite origin in which the proximal elements are r1+r2 derived, whereas more distal ones are exclusively midbrain derived. The most proximal region of the lower jaw is derived from second arch (r4) NC. Second, both the lower jaw and tongue skeleton display an organisation which precisely reflects the rostrocaudal order of segmental crest deployment from the embryonic hindbrain. Third, cryptic intraskeletal boundaries, which do not correspond to anatomical landmarks, form sharply defined interfaces between r1+r2, r4 and r6+r7 crest. Cells that survive the early apoptotic elimination of premigratory NC in r3 and r5 are restricted to tiny contributions within the 2nd arch (r4) skeleton. Fourth, a highly constrained pattern of cranial skeletomuscular connectivity was found that precisely respects the positional origin of its constitutive crest: each rhombomeric population remains coherent throughout ontogeny, forming both the connective tissues of specific muscles and their respective attachment sites onto the neuro- and viscerocranium. Finally, focal clusters of crest cells, confined to the attachment sites of branchial muscles, intrude into the otherwise mesodermal cranial base. In the viscerocranium, an equally strict, rhombomere-specific matching of muscle connective tissues and their attachment sites is found for all branchial and tongue (hypoglossal) muscles. This coherence of segmental crest populations explains how cranial skeletomuscular pattern can be implemented and conserved despite evolutionary changes in the shapes of skeletal elements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8898235     DOI: 10.1242/dev.122.10.3229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  156 in total

Review 1.  Roles of Eph receptors and ephrins in segmental patterning.

Authors:  Q Xu; G Mellitzer; D G Wilkinson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Krox-20 patterns the hindbrain through both cell-autonomous and non cell-autonomous mechanisms.

Authors:  F Giudicelli; E Taillebourg; P Charnay; P Gilardi-Hebenstreit
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 3.  Neural crest patterning and the evolution of the jaw.

Authors:  C B Kimmel; C T Miller; R J Keynes
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 4.  Derivation of the mammalian skull vault.

Authors:  G M Morriss-Kay
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 5.  The development and evolution of the pharyngeal arches.

Authors:  A Graham
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 6.  The evolution of the pectoral girdle.

Authors:  I M McGonnell
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 7.  Early development of the neural plate, neural crest and facial region of marsupials.

Authors:  K K Smith
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 8.  Embryology of the lamprey and evolution of the vertebrate jaw: insights from molecular and developmental perspectives.

Authors:  S Kuratani; Y Nobusada; N Horigome; Y Shigetani
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2001-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Soft-tissue characters in higher primate phylogenetics.

Authors:  S Gibbs; M Collard; B Wood
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Divergent palate morphology in turtles and birds correlates with differences in proliferation and BMP2 expression during embryonic development.

Authors:  John Abramyan; Kelvin Jia-Mien Leung; Joy Marion Richman
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.656

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.