Literature DB >> 8897632

Structured entry of radiology reports using World Wide Web technology.

C E Kahn1, K Wang, D S Bell.   

Abstract

Structured data entry--in which information is entered by using predetermined data elements and formats--has the potential to improve the radiology reporting process. The dependence on particular computer hardware and software platforms has posed a barrier to wider use of this approach. The World Wide Web (WWW), a client-server protocol for delivery of multimedia data via the Internet, was used to achieve platform-independent structured entry of radiology reports. A developmental system for structured entry of radiology reports, called SPIDER, incorporates a knowledge base of hierarchically organized concepts, a WWW server, and two specialized programs. The WebForm program transforms the system's knowledge into graphical WWW data-entry forms; the WebReport program converts data entered on these forms into outline-format reports. SPIDER received favorable evaluations from sonographers and physicians who used the system to record the results of several test cases. WWW technology can be used to achieve platform-independent entry of the results of radiologic procedures.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8897632     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.16.3.8897632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  12 in total

1.  Enhancing the expressiveness of structured reporting systems.

Authors:  C P Langlotz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Enhancing the expressiveness and usability of structured image reporting systems.

Authors:  C P Langlotz; L Meininger
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

3.  Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting.

Authors:  Lawrence H Schwartz; David M Panicek; Alexandra R Berk; Yuelin Li; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Conceptual approach for the design of radiology reporting interfaces: the talking template.

Authors:  Chris L Sistrom
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 5.  Interface terminologies: facilitating direct entry of clinical data into electronic health record systems.

Authors:  S Trent Rosenbloom; Randolph A Miller; Kevin B Johnson; Peter L Elkin; Steven H Brown
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  E-learning tools for education: regulatory aspects, current applications in radiology and future prospects.

Authors:  A Pinto; S Selvaggi; G Sicignano; E Vollono; L Iervolino; F Amato; A Molinari; R Grassi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Evaluation of a method to identify and categorize section headers in clinical documents.

Authors:  Joshua C Denny; Anderson Spickard; Kevin B Johnson; Neeraja B Peterson; Josh F Peterson; Randolph A Miller
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  E-learning in radiology: Italian multicentre experience.

Authors:  A Carriero; B Beomonte Zobel; L Bonomo; G Meloni; A Cotroneo; M Cova; G C Ettorre; C Fugazzola; G Garlaschi; L Macarini; R Pozzi Mucelli; S Sironi; P Torricelli; L Capaccioli; C Zuiani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Knowledge representation for platform-independent structured reporting.

Authors:  C E Kahn; P N Huynh
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1996

10.  Using SNOMED CT to represent two interface terminologies.

Authors:  S Trent Rosenbloom; Steven H Brown; David Froehling; Brent A Bauer; Dietlind L Wahner-Roedler; William M Gregg; Peter L Elkin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.