Literature DB >> 8897474

Motor imagery--anatomical representation and electrophysiological characteristics.

K M Stephan1, R S Frackowiak.   

Abstract

Experience and results of neuropsychological studies have shown that motor imagery can improve motor performance and enhance motor learning. In recent years several electro-physiological and functional imaging studies have investigated the physiological basis for this observation. In the present essay we review two of our recent studies, in which we compared motor imagery with motor preparation and motor execution. In the first we used positron emission tomography to describe their functional anatomy and in the second we employed electromyography, H-reflexes and transcranial magnetic stimulation to delineate their electrophysiological characteristics. Both studies demonstrated that motor imagery shares some characteristics with motor preparation and other, additional ones with motor execution. Thus it can be seen as a special form of motor behaviour, similar but distinct from both motor preparation and execution. This combination of mutual and distinct characteristics may be the key to its successful role in motor learning.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8897474     DOI: 10.1007/bf02532421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurochem Res        ISSN: 0364-3190            Impact factor:   3.996


  30 in total

1.  Preparation for reaching: a PET study of the participating structures in the human brain.

Authors:  J Decety; R Kawashima; B Gulyás; P E Roland
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Willed action and the prefrontal cortex in man: a study with PET.

Authors:  C D Frith; K Friston; P F Liddle; R S Frackowiak
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1991-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Mental representations of movements. Brain potentials associated with imagination of hand movements.

Authors:  R Beisteiner; P Höllinger; G Lindinger; W Lang; A Berthoz
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-03

4.  Relation of pyramidal tract activity to force exerted during voluntary movement.

Authors:  E V Evarts
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Relation between cerebral activity and force in the motor areas of the human brain.

Authors:  C Dettmers; G R Fink; R N Lemon; K M Stephan; R E Passingham; D Silbersweig; A Holmes; M C Ridding; D J Brooks; R S Frackowiak
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  A PET study of visuospatial attention.

Authors:  M Corbetta; F M Miezin; G L Shulman; S E Petersen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Area V5 of the human brain: evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J D Watson; R Myers; R S Frackowiak; J V Hajnal; R P Woods; J C Mazziotta; S Shipp; S Zeki
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Disynaptic inhibition of spinal motoneurones from the motor cortex in the monkey.

Authors:  E Jankowska; Y Padel; R Tanaka
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Impaired mesial frontal and putamen activation in Parkinson's disease: a positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  E D Playford; I H Jenkins; R E Passingham; J Nutt; R S Frackowiak; D J Brooks
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  The role of premotor cortex and the supplementary motor area in the temporal control of movement in man.

Authors:  U Halsband; N Ito; J Tanji; H J Freund
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparing motion- and imagery-related activation in the human cerebellum: a functional MRI study.

Authors:  A R Luft; M Skalej; A Stefanou; U Klose; K Voigt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Impact of neurologic deficits on motor imagery: a systematic review of clinical evaluations.

Authors:  Franck Di Rienzo; Christian Collet; Nady Hoyek; Aymeric Guillot
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  Optimal stimulation parameters for spinal and corticospinal excitabilities during contraction, motor imagery and rest: A pilot study.

Authors:  Amandine Bouguetoch; Sidney Grosprêtre; Alain Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Visual and kinesthetic modes affect motor imagery classification in untrained subjects.

Authors:  Parth Chholak; Guiomar Niso; Vladimir A Maksimenko; Semen A Kurkin; Nikita S Frolov; Elena N Pitsik; Alexander E Hramov; Alexander N Pisarchik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Stabilometric Correlates of Motor and Motor Imagery Expertise.

Authors:  Franck Di Rienzo; Pierric Joassy; Thiago Ferreira Dias Kanthack; François Moncel; Quentin Mercier; Christian Collet; Aymeric Guillot
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Handedness impacts the neural correlates of kinesthetic motor imagery and execution: A FMRI study.

Authors:  Monica Crotti; Karl Koschutnig; Selina Christin Wriessnegger
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 4.433

Review 7.  Online and Offline Performance Gains Following Motor Imagery Practice: A Comprehensive Review of Behavioral and Neuroimaging Studies.

Authors:  Franck Di Rienzo; Ursula Debarnot; Sébastien Daligault; Elodie Saruco; Claude Delpuech; Julien Doyon; Christian Collet; Aymeric Guillot
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Suppressing Systemic Interference in fNIRS Monitoring of the Hemodynamic Cortical Response to Motor Execution and Imagery.

Authors:  Shijing Wu; Jun Li; Lantian Gao; Changshui Chen; Sailing He
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.