Literature DB >> 8897267

Inverse targeting of peritoneal tumors: selective alteration of the disposition of methotrexate through the use of anti-methotrexate antibodies and antibody fragments.

J P Balthasar1, H L Fung.   

Abstract

We have hypothesized that antidrug antibodies (ADAb) may be employed to impart site-specific alterations in the disposition of drug molecules, potentially allowing for targeted drug therapy. We are specifically interested in minimizing systemic exposure to free drug and systemic toxicities resultant from regional chemotherapy through the intravenous administration of ADAb. In this report, we present the production and purification of anti-methotrexate Fab fragments, and we present investigations of the effects of anti-methotrexate Fab and anti-methotrexate immunoglobulin G on the disposition of methotrexate in the rat. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed that intravenous anti-methotrexate immunoglobulin G (anti-MTX IgG) and anti-methotrexate Fab (anti-MTX Fab) administration produced dramatic alterations in the plasma pharmacokinetics of methotrexate (MTX), following intraperitoneal MTX administration (area under the total MTX concentration vs time curve for anti-MTX IgG relative to control, 420 +/- 90 (p < 0.05); for anti-MTX Fab relative to control, 46 +/- 6.1 (p < 0.05); area under the free MTX concentration vs time curve for anti-MTX IgG relative to control, 0.64 +/- 0.16; for anti-MTX Fab relative to control, 0.45 +/- 0.20 (p < 0.05)). Additional studies conducted in anesthetized rats revealed no significant alterations in the area under the total peritoneal MTX concentration vs time curves, free MTX peritoneal concentration vs time curves, or peritoneal exit rate of MTX in anti-MTX Fab treated animals relative to controls. Therefore, our pharmacokinetic studies demonstrate that ADAb may produce site-specific alterations in drug pharmacokinetics, potentially enhancing the site specificity of drug distribution and drug action following regional chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8897267     DOI: 10.1021/js960135w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  7 in total

1.  Properties of a general PK/PD model of antibody-ligand interactions for therapeutic antibodies that bind to soluble endogenous targets.

Authors:  Jasmine P Davda; Ryan J Hansen
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.857

2.  Scale-up of a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model to predict the disposition of monoclonal antibodies in monkeys.

Authors:  Patrick M Glassman; Yang Chen; Joseph P Balthasar
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  PK/TD modeling for prediction of the effects of 8C2, an anti-topotecan mAb, on topotecan-induced toxicity in mice.

Authors:  Dhaval K Shah; Joseph P Balthasar
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 5.875

4.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for topotecan in mice.

Authors:  Dhaval K Shah; Joseph P Balthasar
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  Predicting the effects of 8C2, a monoclonal anti-topotecan antibody, on plasma and tissue disposition of topotecan.

Authors:  Dhaval K Shah; Joseph P Balthasar
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 2.745

6.  Mathematical modeling of topotecan pharmacokinetics and toxicodynamics in mice.

Authors:  Jin Chen; Qiang Lu; Joseph P Balthasar
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 2.410

7.  Unraveling the pharmacokinetic interaction of ticagrelor and MEDI2452 (Ticagrelor antidote) by mathematical modeling.

Authors:  J Almquist; M Penney; S Pehrsson; A-S Sandinge; A Janefeldt; S Maqbool; S Madalli; J Goodman; S Nylander; P Gennemark
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2016-06-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.