Literature DB >> 8896863

Failed spinal anaesthesia: cause identified by MRI.

Y Hirabayashi1, H Fukuda, K Saitoh, S Inoue, H Mitsuhata, R Shimizu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the cause of failed spinal anaesthesia, magnetic resonance images of the lumbar spine were examined. CLINICAL FUTURES: A 28-yr-old woman, scheduled for closure of a rectal fistula under spinal anaesthesia, hyperbaric tetracaine 12.5 mg injected into the subarachnoid space at L3-4 repeatedly resulted in restricted sacral spread. Magnetic resonance imaging showed that the cylindrical dimension of the lumbar spinal canal was wider than in normal subjects, suggesting a larger volume of CSF within the dural sac below the termination of the cord. The summit of the lumbar convexity was located at L3, which was more cephalad than the L3-4 puncture site.
CONCLUSION: The uncommon anatomical characteristics of the lumbar spinal canal identified by magnetic resonance imaging were considered to be the reason for the restricted sacral spread observed repeatedly in this patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8896863     DOI: 10.1007/BF03011913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  7 in total

1.  How to proceed following a "failed spinal".

Authors:  E Abouleish
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Repeat injection after a "failed spinal": at times, a potentially unsafe practice.

Authors:  K Drasner; M L Rigler
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  A retrospective analysis of failed spinal anesthetic attempts in a community hospital.

Authors:  L Manchikanti; C Hadley; S J Markwell; J A Colliver
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 4.  Distribution of local anesthetic solutions within the subarachnoid space.

Authors:  N M Greene
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  A retrospective study of the incidence and causes of failed spinal anesthetics in a university hospital.

Authors:  J H Levy; J A Islas; J N Ghia; C Turnbull
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Incidence and etiology of failed spinal anesthetics in a university hospital: a prospective study.

Authors:  R J Munhall; R Sukhani; A P Winnie
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Anatomical configuration of the spinal column in the supine position. I. A study using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Y Hirabayashi; R Shimizu; K Saitoh; H Fukuda; M Furuse
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 9.166

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Large intrathecal volume: a cause of true failed spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  Joan E Spiegel; Philip Hess
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Does unilateral hip flexion increase the spinal anaesthetic level during combined spinal-epidural technique?

Authors:  Medha Mohta; Deepti Agarwal; Ak Sethi
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2011-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.