Literature DB >> 8896850

Double burst stimulation2,3: a new stimulating pattern for residual neuromuscular block.

Y Saitoh1, K Nakazawa, H Tanaka, H Toyooka, K Amaha.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We present a new stimulating pattern: double burst stimulation2,3 (DBS2,3) for evaluating residual neuromuscular block.
METHODS: Forty adult patients were studied. For DBS2,3, two burst stimuli were applied every 750 msec. The first consisted of two tetanic stimuli of 0.2 msec duration and the second of three tetanic stimuli of 0.2 msec duration. At varying degrees of neuromuscular block induced by vecuronium, the presence or absence of fade, or the presence or absence of waxing (i.e., the feeling that the muscular contraction in response to the second burst was stronger than that to the first) was determined by an observer blinded to the depth of neuromuscular block. In addition, the relationship between the train-of-four (TOF) ratio and DBS2,3 ratio was established at varying depths of neuromuscular block (TOF ratio 0.04-1.00).
RESULTS: The probabilities of tactile detection of fade in response to DBS2,3 were 100, 76, 15, 9, 3, 0, and 0% at a TOF ratio of 0-0.40, 0.41-0.50, 0.51-0.60, 0.61-0.70, 0.71-0.80, 0.81-0.90, and 0.91-1.00, respectively. Waxing in response to the DBS2,3 was identified in 0, 6, 32, 84, and 98% of cases when the TOF ratios were 0.00-0.60, 0.61-0.70, 0.71-0.80, 0.81-0.90, and 0.91-1.00, respectively. A close linear relationship existed between the TOF ratio and DBS2,3 ratio (r = 0.96, P < 0.000001).
CONCLUSION: DBS2,3 is of clinical use because when residual neuromuscular block is clinically important, fade can be identified, but once neuromuscular function returns to a sufficient level, waxing can be detected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8896850     DOI: 10.1007/BF03011900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  11 in total

1.  The effect of tubocurarine on indirectly elicited train-of-four muscle response and respiratory measurements in humans.

Authors:  H H Ali; R S Wilson; J J Savarese; R J Kitz
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  The best choice of double burst stimulation pattern for manual evaluation of neuromuscular transmission.

Authors:  N Ueda; J V-Mogensen; N V-Olsen; N E-Drenck; H Tsuda; T Muteki
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1989-03-01       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Double burst stimulation (DBS): a new pattern of nerve stimulation to identify residual neuromuscular block.

Authors:  J Engbaek; D Ostergaard; J Viby-Mogensen
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 4.  Monitoring of neuromuscular function.

Authors:  H H Ali; J J Savarese
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Manual evaluation of residual curarization using double burst stimulation: a comparison with train-of-four.

Authors:  N E Drenck; N Ueda; N V Olsen; J Engbaek; E Jensen; L T Skovgaard; J Viby-Mogensen
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Frequency of train-of-four stimulation influences neuromuscular response.

Authors:  O A Meretoja; T Taivainen; B W Brandom; K Wirtavuori
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 7.  Clinical assessment of neuromuscular transmission.

Authors:  J Viby-Mogensen
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Tactile and visual evaluation of the response to train-of-four nerve stimulation.

Authors:  J Viby-Mogensen; N H Jensen; J Engbaek; H Ording; L T Skovgaard; B Chraemmer-Jørgensen
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Correlation of train-of-four and double burst stimulation ratios at varying amperages.

Authors:  S J Brull; N R Connelly; D G Silverman
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Visual assessment of train-of-four and double burst-induced fade at submaximal stimulating currents.

Authors:  S J Brull; D G Silverman
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.108

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.