Literature DB >> 8895040

Effect of antihypertensive treatment on qualitative estimates of microalbuminuria.

B Agrawal1, K Wolf, A Berger, F C Luft.   

Abstract

We tested the utility of qualitative microalbuminuria (MAU) screening in an office practice setting, in assessing the response of MAU to drug treatment. We enrolled general practitioners throughout Germany, who obtained histories, physical examinations, and routine laboratory values as clinically indicated on > 6000 non-treated hypertensive, nondiabetic patients. MAU was measured with an albumin-sensitive, immunoassay test strip. The patients were then assigned to monotherapy by their physicians with carvedilol, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, and other single regimens in an open-label fashion. The goal was diastolic pressure < 90 mm Hg or at least a 10 mm Hg decrease in systolic (S) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). The patients' mean age was 57 years and 51% were men. The mean known hypertension duration was 69 months. MAU was present in 37% of men and 34% of women. All regimens lowered BP. All regimens caused large numbers of MAU patients to revert by 3 months. MAU reversal occurred in patients less than 65 years as well as in those 65 years or older. Multiple regression analysis indicated that systolic and DBP reduction, duration of hypertension, and body size were most associated with MAU reversal. Thus, MAU determinations reverted to negative with antihypertensive treatment in many patients. BP reduction was the single most important variable in reversing MAU. All drug regimens were effective. We conclude that qualitative MAU detection is useful not only for screening, but also for follow-up nondiabetic patients with hypertension in an office practice setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8895040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  8 in total

Review 1.  Capillary rarefaction as an index for the microvascular assessment of hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Areti Triantafyllou; Panagiota Anyfanti; Athina Pyrpasopoulou; Georgios Triantafyllou; Spyros Aslanidis; Stella Douma
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Sympathetic nerves and the progression of chronic kidney disease during 5/6 nephrectomy: studies in sympathectomized rats.

Authors:  Robert A Augustyniak; Maria M Picken; David Leonard; Xin J Zhou; Weiguo Zhang; Ronald G Victor
Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 2.557

Review 3.  Renal protection and antihypertensive drugs: current status.

Authors:  A Salvetti; P Mattei; I Sudano
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Carvedilol. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  C J Dunn; A P Lea; A J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Microalbuminuria in hypertension.

Authors:  Paolo Palatini
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 6.  Use of pioglitazone in the treatment of diabetes: effect on cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Cong Zou; Honglin Hu
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2013-07-25

Review 7.  Use of carvedilol in hypertension: an update.

Authors:  Gastone Leonetti; Colin G Egan
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2012-05-18

Review 8.  Carvedilol in hypertension treatment.

Authors:  Panagiotis C Stafylas; Pantelis A Sarafidis
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2008
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.