Literature DB >> 8894565

Mammographic signs of potential relevance to breast cancer risk: the agreement of radiologists' classification.

R Jong1, E Fishell, L Little, G Lockwood, N F Boyd.   

Abstract

We have assessed the agreement of radiologists who quantitatively estimated the extent of various mammographic features of the breast. These features are of potential relevance to the estimation of the future risk of developing breast cancer. After preparation, in which various mammographic appearances and their classification were discussed and agreed upon, two radiologists, experienced in mammography, independently estimated the extent of various types of radiological density in 120 sets of mammograms, each comprised of two mediolateral and two craniocaudal views. The results showed a high level of agreement between the two radiologists in the classification of total mammographic densities (r = 0.89). For classification of specific types of density, agreement was best for homogeneous densities (r = 0.79), more intermediate for nodular densities (r = 0.71) and worst for linear densities (r = 0.48). These results show that radiologists can, with suitable preparation, identify total breast density, a mammographic sign relevant to a woman's risk of later developing breast cancer, with a high degree of agreement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8894565     DOI: 10.1097/00008469-199608000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 0959-8278            Impact factor:   2.497


  5 in total

Review 1.  Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Michael Bronskill; Martin J Yaffe; Neb Duric; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Reproducibility of BI-RADS breast density measures among community radiologists: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mary C Spayne; Charlotte C Gard; Joan Skelly; Diana L Miglioretti; Pamela M Vacek; Berta M Geller
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  Determinants of the reliability of ultrasound tomography sound speed estimates as a surrogate for volumetric breast density.

Authors:  Zeina G Khodr; Mark A Sak; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Nebojsa Duric; Peter Littrup; Lisa Bey-Knight; Haythem Ali; Patricia Vallieres; Mark E Sherman; Gretchen L Gierach
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Evaluation of mammographic density patterns: reproducibility and concordance among scales.

Authors:  Macarena Garrido-Estepa; Francisco Ruiz-Perales; Josefa Miranda; Nieves Ascunce; Isabel González-Román; Carmen Sánchez-Contador; Carmen Santamariña; Pilar Moreo; Carmen Vidal; Mercé Peris; María P Moreno; Jose A Váquez-Carrete; Francisca Collado-García; Francisco Casanova; María Ederra; Dolores Salas; Marina Pollán
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 5.  Mammographic density.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Martin Yaffe; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 6.466

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.