Literature DB >> 8893103

Rate of mesial translation of mandibular molars using implant-anchored mechanics.

W E Roberts1, G R Arbuckle, M Analoui.   

Abstract

Retromolar dental implants served as anchorage to close first molar extraction sites in five adult patients. Rates of unidirectional space closure for mandibular second molars were assessed with periapical radiographs superimposed on anatomical landmarks and retromolar anchorage implants. Regression analysis revealed that mesial displacement of the midroot area of the leading root was less variable (r = 0.97) than for other landmarks on the same teeth: crown (r = 0.83), alveolar crest (r = 0.82) or apex (r = 0.90). When mesial root movement (uprighting) was the principal feature of the initial mechanics (4 of the 5 patients), mesial movement of the apex was about 0.60 mm/mo for the first 8 months and then decreased to about 0.34 mm/mo as the trailing (distal) root of the second molar engaged the relatively dense bone formed by the leading (mesial) root. During the last year of space closure, radiolucent foci were noted 1-2 mm ahead of the distal root. These data suggest: (1) sustained orthodontic translation is a physiological manifestation of bone modeling and remodeling throughout the adjacent alveolar process, and (2) rate of mandibular molar translation is inversely related to the apparent radiographic density of the resisting alveolar bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8893103     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1996)066<0331:ROMTOM>2.3.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  8 in total

1.  Effects of orthodontic treatment on human alveolar bone density distribution.

Authors:  Hechang Huang; Michael Richards; Tamer Bedair; Henry W Fields; J Martin Palomo; William M Johnston; Do-Gyoon Kim
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Modeling of trabecular bone and lamina dura following selective alveolar decortication in rats.

Authors:  Jean-David Sebaoun; Alpdogan Kantarci; John W Turner; Roberto S Carvalho; Thomas E Van Dyke; Donald J Ferguson
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.993

3.  Corticotomy-assisted molar protraction with the aid of temporary anchorage device.

Authors:  Flavio Uribe; Nandakumar Janakiraman; Amine N Fattal; Gian Pietro Schincaglia; Ravindra Nanda
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Use of the intraosseous screw for unilateral upper molar distalization and found well balanced occlusion.

Authors:  Ibrahim Erhan Gelgor; Ali Ihya Karaman; Tamer Buyukyilmaz
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  Mini-implants: new possibilities in interdisciplinary treatment approaches.

Authors:  Biju Sebastian
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2014-12-14

6.  The use of intraosseous screw for upper molar distalization: a case report.

Authors:  Omür Polat-Ozsoy
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2008-04

7.  A clinical comparative evaluation of periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics with piezo and surgical bur: An interdisciplinary approach.

Authors:  Supreet Kaur Thind; Anirban Chatterjee; Faisal Arshad; Paramjeet Singh Sandhu; Manpreet Singh Thind; Javeriya Nahin
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug

8.  Evaluation of the effects of photobiomodulation on orthodontic movement of molar verticalization with mini-implant: A randomized double-blind protocol study.

Authors:  Felipe Murakami-Malaquias-Silva; Ellen Perim Rosa; Paulo André Almeida; Tânia Oppido Schalch; Carlos Alberto Tenis; Renata Matalon Negreiros; Ricardo Fidos Horliana; Aguinaldo Silva Garcez; Marcella Ueda R Fernandes; Andre Tortamano; Lara Jansiski Motta; Sandra Kalil Bussadori; Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini Horliana
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.