Literature DB >> 8892446

Usefulness of urine dipstick tests. Packaging may lead to false positive results.

A Edwards, S Granier, J van der Voort.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1996        PMID： 8892446      PMCID： PMC2352313          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.313.7063.1010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Use of routine urinalysis in making a presumptive diagnosis of urinary tract infection in children.

Authors:  J A Lohr
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  False positive results for leucocytes in urine dipstick test with common antibiotics.

Authors:  J H Beer; A Vogt; K Neftel; P Cottagnoud
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-06

3.  The diagnostic accuracy of rapid dipstick tests to predict urinary tract infection.

Authors:  T A Hurlbut; B Littenberg
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Making a presumptive diagnosis of urinary tract infection by using a urinalysis performed in an on-site laboratory.

Authors:  J A Lohr; M G Portilla; T G Geuder; M L Dunn; S M Dudley
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.406
  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  A urine analysis method suitable for children's nappies.

Authors:  A Edwards; J van der Voort; R Newcombe; H Thayer; K Verrier Jones
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  The urine dipstick test useful to rule out infections. A meta-analysis of the accuracy.

Authors:  Walter L J M Devillé; Joris C Yzermans; Nico P van Duijn; P Dick Bezemer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 2.264
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.