Literature DB >> 8892433

Correcting outcome data for case mix in stroke medicine. Structure and process should be audited, rather than outcomes.

D Barer, J Ellul, C Watkins.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8892433      PMCID: PMC2352292          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.313.7063.1005c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Effect of correcting outcome data for case mix: an example from stroke medicine.

Authors:  R J Davenport; M S Dennis; C P Warlow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-06-15

2.  Interobserver variability in the assessment of neurologic history and examination in the Stroke Data Bank.

Authors:  D Shinar; C R Gross; J P Mohr; L R Caplan; T R Price; P A Wolf; D B Hier; C S Kase; I G Fishman; C L Wolf
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1985-06

3.  Detecting differences in quality of care: the sensitivity of measures of process and outcome in treating acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Mant; N Hicks
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-23
  3 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy of Electronic Health Record Data for Identifying Stroke Cases in Large-Scale Epidemiological Studies: A Systematic Review from the UK Biobank Stroke Outcomes Group.

Authors:  Rebecca Woodfield; Ian Grant; Cathie L M Sudlow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Validity of Acute Cardiovascular Outcome Diagnoses Recorded in European Electronic Health Records: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jennifer Davidson; Amitava Banerjee; Rutendo Muzambi; Liam Smeeth; Charlotte Warren-Gash
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.790

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.