Literature DB >> 8890861

Factors affecting participation in mammography screening.

B McNoe1, A K Richardson, J M Elwood.   

Abstract

AIMS: To assess factors influencing attendance or nonattendance at the first round of a population based mammography screening programme, in New Zealand.
METHOD: Representative samples of women who responded to an invitation to attend screening, and women who did not respond, were interviewed by telephone, by an interviewer independent of the screening programme. The response rates in those identified were 98% for attenders and 86% for nonattenders, giving final samples of 191 and 174 respectively. However, more nonattenders could not be contacted or had no known phone number.
RESULTS: Reasons given for attendance were primarily the need for reassurance, to detect breast cancer early, and the fact that the programme was free, a pilot programme, or recommended by their family doctor. Seventeen percent of attenders had been influenced by positive reports from other women. Of the nonattenders, 7% were ineligible for mammography, 20% did not attend because of practical difficulties and convenience, and 20% expressed concern or fear of the procedure or were influenced by negative reports from other women. Attenders and nonattenders did not differ in regard to age, education, income, socioeconomic status, degree of worry when the invitation was received, or physical distance from their home to the screening centre, although nonattenders estimated the travel would take considerably longer than did attenders. Ninety percent of attenders intend to come to the second round of screening. Forty three percent of nonattenders intend to participate at future rounds of screening, this figure being 80% in those who did not attend because of logistic or convenience reasons, and 27% for those who did not attend because of fear or negative reports.
CONCLUSIONS: The main reasons given for nonattendance are approximately equally divided between practical difficulty, and negative attitude towards the process. Most of those who did not attend for reasons of convenience intend to participate at future rounds, so that overall almost half of nonattenders intend to participate at future rounds. Therefore we recommend that invitations for future screening rounds should be sent to women who do not participate in the first round of population based screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8890861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Med J        ISSN: 0028-8446


  6 in total

1.  The impact of directed choice on the design of preventive healthcare facility network under congestion.

Authors:  Navneet Vidyarthi; Onur Kuzgunkaya
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2014-05-31

2.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast Medical Tactile Examiners (MTEs): A Prospective Pilot Study.

Authors:  Michael P Lux; Julius Emons; Mayada R Bani; Marius Wunderle; Charlotte Sell; Caroline Preuss; Claudia Rauh; Sebastian M Jud; Felix Heindl; Hanna Langemann; Thomas Geyer; Anna-Lisa Brandl; Carolin C Hack; Werner Adler; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Matthias W Beckmann; Peter A Fasching; Paul Gass
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Sociodemographic determinants of nonattendance in a population-based mammography screening program in the city of Manisa, Turkey.

Authors:  Pınar Erbay Dundar; Beyhan Cengiz Ozyurt; Koray Erdurak
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-03-12

4.  Organized screening programmes for breast and cervical cancer in 17 EU countries: trajectories of attendance rates.

Authors:  Maria Michela Gianino; Jacopo Lenzi; Marco Bonaudo; Maria Pia Fantini; Roberta Siliquini; Walter Ricciardi; Gianfranco Damiani
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  The role of effective communication to enhance participation in screening mammography: a New Zealand case.

Authors:  Margaret A Brunton
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Determinants of non attendance to mammography program in a region with high voluntary health insurance coverage.

Authors:  Magdalena Esteva; Joana Ripoll; Alfonso Leiva; Carmen Sánchez-Contador; Francisca Collado
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.