Literature DB >> 8890721

Bioavailability and bioactivity of three different doses of nasal growth hormone (GH) administered to GH-deficient patients: comparison with intravenous and subcutaneous administration.

T Laursen1, B Grandjean, J O Jørgensen, J S Christiansen.   

Abstract

The current mode of growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy is daily subcutaneous (s.c.) injections given in the evening. This schedule is unable to mimic the endogenous pulsatile pattern of GH secretion, which might be of importance for the induction of growth and other GH actions. The present study was conducted in order to study the pharmacokinetics of different doses of GH following intranasal (i.n.) administration and the biological activity of GH after i.n. administration as compared with sc and intravenous (i.v.) delivery. Sixteen GH-deficient patients were studied on five different occasions. On three occasions GH was administered intranasally in doses of 0.05, 0.10 and 0.20 IU/kg, using didecanoyl-L-alpha-phosphatidylcholine as an enhancer. On the other two occasions the patients received an sc injection (0.10 IU/kg) and an i.v. injection (0.015 IU/kg) of GH, respectively. The nasal doses and the sc injection were given in random order in a crossover design. In a double-blinded manner the subjects received the three nasal doses as one puff in each nostril. The patients received no GH treatment between the five studies or during the last week before the start of each study. Intravenous administration produced a short-lived serum GH peak value of 128.12 +/- 6.71 micrograms/l. Peak levels were 13.98 +/- 1.63 micrograms/l after s.c. injection and 3.26 +/- 0.38, 7.07 +/- 0.80 and 8.37 +/- 1.31 micrograms/l, respectively, after the three nasal doses. The peak values of the 0.05 and the 0.20 IU/kg nasal doses were significantly different (p = 0.007). The mean levels obtained by the low nasal dose were significantly lower than those obtained with the medium (p < 0.001) and the high dose (p < 0.001), while there was no significant difference between the medium and the high doses. The absolute bioavailability of GH following s.c. relative to i.v. administration was 49.5%. The bioavailabilities of the nasal doses were: 7.8% (0.05 IU). 8.9% (0.10 IU) and 3.8% (0.20 IU). Serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels increased significantly after s.c. administration only. Mean levels were significantly higher after s.c. administration as compared with the i.v. and all three nasal does (p < 0.001). Serum IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) levels remained unchanged on all five occasions. Mean serum IGFBP-I levels were significantly lower after s.c. GH injection than after administration of the i.v. (p < 0.001) and the three nasal doses (p < 0.005). Subcutaneous GH administration resulted in significantly higher levels of serum insulin and blood glucose (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the bioavailability of nasal GH was low (3.8-8.9%). An i.v. bolus injection of, on average, 1 IU of GH induced no metabolic response. Only s.c. GH administration induced increased levels of IGF-I, insulin and glucose. These data reveal that a closer imitation of the physiological GH pulses than achieved by s.c. GH administration is of limited importance for the induction of a metabolic response to GH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8890721     DOI: 10.1530/eje.0.1350309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol        ISSN: 0804-4643            Impact factor:   6.664


  9 in total

Review 1.  Mechanistic determinants of biotherapeutics absorption following SC administration.

Authors:  Wolfgang F Richter; Suraj G Bhansali; Marilyn E Morris
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Translational mixed-effects PKPD modelling of recombinant human growth hormone - from hypophysectomized rat to patients.

Authors:  A Thorsted; P Thygesen; H Agersø; T Laursen; M Kreilgaard
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  The absorption profile and availability of a physiological subcutaneously administered dose of recombinant human growth hormone (GH) in adults with GH deficiency.

Authors:  Y J Janssen; M Frölich; F Roelfsema
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Comparison of pulsatile vs. continuous administration of human placental growth hormone in female C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Shutan Liao; Mark H Vickers; Angharad Evans; Joanna L Stanley; Philip N Baker; Jo K Perry
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 5.  Developments in human growth hormone preparations: sustained-release, prolonged half-life, novel injection devices, and alternative delivery routes.

Authors:  Yunpeng Cai; Mingxin Xu; Minglu Yuan; Zhenguo Liu; Weien Yuan
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-07-25

6.  Intranasal Human Growth Hormone (hGH) Induces IGF-1 Levels Comparable With Subcutaneous Injection With Lower Systemic Exposure to hGH in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Andrew L Lewis; Faron Jordan; Tina Patel; Kirk Jeffery; Gareth King; Martin Savage; Stephen Shalet; Lisbeth Illum
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 7.  Peptide hormones and lipopeptides: from self-assembly to therapeutic applications.

Authors:  J A Hutchinson; S Burholt; I W Hamley
Journal:  J Pept Sci       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 1.905

8.  A Bottom-Up Whole-Body Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model to Mechanistically Predict Tissue Distribution and the Rate of Subcutaneous Absorption of Therapeutic Proteins.

Authors:  Katherine L Gill; Iain Gardner; Linzhong Li; Masoud Jamei
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 9.  Nasal delivery of high molecular weight drugs.

Authors:  Yildiz Ozsoy; Sevgi Gungor; Erdal Cevher
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 4.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.