Literature DB >> 8890488

Age differences in support processes in conversations between friends.

K Denton1, L Zarbatany.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine age differences in the use and effectiveness of social support processes emitted during conversations about real life negative events between preadolescent, adolescent, and adult friends. Age differences were found for 3 forms of support. Older supporters made more excuses and engaged in less distraction than preadolescent supporters, and adult supporters validated more excuses than younger supporters. Talking to friends alleviated negative affect in subjects of all ages, however factors predicting reductions in negative affect differed across age. Preadolescents felt better when friends distracted them from their problems, and adults felt better when friends helped them evade responsibility for their problems. Specific support processes did not predict affect changes for adolescents, but adolescent girls felt better after the conversation than adolescent boys. Results are explained in terms of age differences in self-validation and intimacy needs, experience co-constructing reality and providing social support, and refinement of social skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8890488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Dev        ISSN: 0009-3920


  3 in total

1.  Friendship quality and psychosocial outcomes among children with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Sara Heverly-Fitt; Maureen A Wimsatt; Melissa M Menzer; Kenneth H Rubin; Maureen Dennis; H Gerry Taylor; Terry Stancin; Cynthia A Gerhardt; Kathryn Vannatta; Erin D Bigler; Keith Owen Yeates
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 2.892

2.  Paranoia, self-deception and overconfidence.

Authors:  Rosa A Rossi-Goldthorpe; Yuan Chang Leong; Pantelis Leptourgos; Philip R Corlett
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Mental health status of healthcare workers assisted in Hubei during the initial outbreak of COVID-19 and their influencing factors: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Peng Zhou; Na Du; Yu Xiao; Yunge Li; Chunya Li; Ting Geng
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.006

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.