Literature DB >> 8888987

Classic conditioning in aged rabbits: delay, trace, and long-delay conditioning.

P R Solomon1, M E Groccia-Ellison.   

Abstract

Young (0.5 years) and aged (2+, 3+, and 4+ years) rabbits underwent acquisition of the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response in a delay (500-ms conditioned stimulus [CS], 400-ms interstimulus interval [ISI]), long-delay (1,000-ms CS, 900-ms ISI), or trace (500-ms CS, 400-ms stimulus-free period) paradigm. Collapsing across age groups, there is a general tendency for animals to acquire trace conditioning more slowly than delay conditioning. Collapsing across conditioning paradigms, there is a general tendency for aged animals to acquire more slowly than younger animals. Of greater significance, however, are the age differences in the different conditioning paradigms. In the delay and long-delay paradigms, significant conditioning deficits first appeared in the 4(+)-year-old group. In the trace conditioning paradigm, significant conditioning deficits became apparent in the 2(+)-year-old animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8888987     DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.110.3.427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  15 in total

1.  Nonpharmacological amelioration of age-related learning deficits: the impact of hippocampal theta-triggered training.

Authors:  Yukiko Asaka; Kristin N Mauldin; Amy L Griffin; Matthew A Seager; Elizabeth Shurell; Stephen D Berry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Temporal discontiguity is neither necessary nor sufficient for learning-induced effects on adult neurogenesis.

Authors:  Benedetta Leuner; Jaylyn Waddell; Elizabeth Gould; Tracey J Shors
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-12-27       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The role of awareness in delay and trace fear conditioning in humans.

Authors:  David C Knight; Hanh T Nguyen; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Effects of paradigm and inter-stimulus interval on age differences in eyeblink classical conditioning in rabbits.

Authors:  Diana S Woodruff-Pak; Susan E Seta; LaToya A Roker; Melissa A Lehr
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 5.  Learning to learn - intrinsic plasticity as a metaplasticity mechanism for memory formation.

Authors:  Megha Sehgal; Chenghui Song; Vanessa L Ehlers; James R Moyer
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 6.  Forgetfulness during aging: an integrated biology.

Authors:  Paul E Gold; Donna L Korol
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 7.  Conserved regulators of cognitive aging: From worms to humans.

Authors:  Rachel N Arey; Coleen T Murphy
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Young and older good learners have higher levels of brain nicotinic receptor binding.

Authors:  Diana S Woodruff-Pak; Melissa A Lehr; Jian-Guo Li; Lee-Yuan Liu-Chen
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 4.673

9.  Structural awareness mitigates the effect of delay in human causal learning.

Authors:  W James Greville; Adam A Cassar; Mark K Johansen; Marc J Buehner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-08

10.  Neural Protein Synthesis during Aging: Effects on Plasticity and Memory.

Authors:  Lesley A Schimanski; Carol A Barnes
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 5.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.