Literature DB >> 8888477

Design considerations for estimation of exposure effects on disease risk, using aggregate data studies.

L Sheppard1, R L Prentice, M A Rossing.   

Abstract

Previously we proposed an aggregate data study design for estimation of exposure effects from population-based disease rates and covariate data from risk factor surveys in each population group. A basic relative rate model specified for individuals is aggregated to produce a random effects relative rate model for the disease rates. Relative rate parameter estimates from aggregate data studies target the same parameters as individual-level studies but use between-group information in the data. We distinguish aggregate data studies from ecologic studies. Considerations in the design of aggregate studies are motivated by the need to gain clearer understanding of the role of diet in cancer aetiology. Simulation studies show that increasing the number of populations included in an aggregate data study from about 20 to 30-40 gives greater improvement in power than corresponding increases in the size of the survey sample in each population over an initial size of 100 individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8888477     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960915)15:17<1849::AID-SIM396>3.0.CO;2-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  6 in total

Review 1.  Designs for the combination of group- and individual-level data.

Authors:  Sebastien Haneuse; Scott Bartell
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Spatial Aggregation and the Ecological Fallacy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Chapman Hall CRC Handb Mod Stat Methods       Date:  2010

3.  Linkage of survey data with district-level lung cancer registrations: a method of bias reduction in ecological studies.

Authors:  Gillian A Lancaster; Mick Green; Steven Lane
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  A novel method for identifying settings for well-motivated ecologic studies of cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Stang; Bernd Kowall; Carsten Rusner; Britton Trabert; Freddie Bray; Joachim Schüz; Katherine A McGlynn; Oliver Kuss
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Childhood exposure due to the Chernobyl accident and thyroid cancer risk in contaminated areas of Belarus and Russia.

Authors:  P Jacob; Y Kenigsberg; I Zvonova; G Goulko; E Buglova; W F Heidenreich; A Golovneva; A A Bratilova; V Drozdovitch; J Kruk; G T Pochtennaja; M Balonov; E P Demidchik; H G Paretzke
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Design issues in small-area studies of environment and health.

Authors:  Paul Elliott; David A Savitz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.